Exploring Time Dilation: From Twin Paradox to Maximum Speed of Future Spaceships

In summary: But when he sees the Earth twin aging faster, can't he just consider that he is aging faster than the Earth twin.In summary, the concept of time dilation in special relativity states that time will appear to move slower for an observer in motion compared to an observer at rest. However, in general relativity, there is a phenomenon called gravitational time dilation where time moves slower near massive objects or during acceleration. In the case of the twin paradox, the traveling twin will experience time dilation throughout their journey, but upon returning to Earth, they will see the Earth-based twin aging faster due to the effects of acceleration. This phenomenon is not specific to relativity and can also be observed
  • #1
Tomahoc
36
0
Has any experiments been done equal to this scenerio where the twin leaving Earth and seeing Earth time dilated.. but when the twin reverses and returns to earth, the Earth speeds up or go in fast motion? If time dilation is slowing down.. what is the term for time speeding up?


Also what is the realistic maximum speed of future spaceship... we know it can't reach 0.999c... so any arguments or theorem that real ship can go only certain top speed (for example 0.5c) which the fastest in any conceivable future?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Tomahoc said:
Has any experiments been done equal to this scenerio where the twin leaving Earth and seeing Earth time dilated.. but when the twin reverses and returns to earth, the Earth speeds up or go in fast motion? If time dilation is slowing down.. what is the term for time speeding up?

In special relativity, there is no 'speeding up of time'. That is: if Person 1 sees the time of person 2 going slow, then no matter what, Person 2 will see Person 1's time going slow too. This may seem counterintuitive and paradoxical, but it's what happens. It comes from the fact that since all inertial frames are equally valid, any 'motion' Frame 1 might see in Frame 2 is interpreted with equal validity as Frame 2 seeing motion in Frame 1.

In General Relativity though, there is a thing called Gravitational Time Dilation. This time dilation has to do either with being near a massive body or undergoing acceleration (the two are equivalent in General Relativity). Unlike Special Relativity's Time Dilation, where both Observers could claim the other Observer's time is moving slower than their own, with Gravitational Time Dilation one Observer would say the other observer's time is moving slower and the other observer would agree.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation
 
  • #3
Vorde said:
In special relativity, there is no 'speeding up of time'. That is: if Person 1 sees the time of person 2 going slow, then no matter what, Person 2 will see Person 1's time going slow too. This may seem counterintuitive and paradoxical, but it's what happens. It comes from the fact that since all inertial frames are equally valid, any 'motion' Frame 1 might see in Frame 2 is interpreted with equal validity as Frame 2 seeing motion in Frame 1.

In General Relativity though, there is a thing called Gravitational Time Dilation. This time dilation has to do either with being near a massive body or undergoing acceleration (the two are equivalent in General Relativity). Unlike Special Relativity's Time Dilation, where both Observers could claim the other Observer's time is moving slower than their own, with Gravitational Time Dilation one Observer would say the other observer's time is moving slower and the other observer would agree.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

Hmm.. have you forgotten that when the traveling twin returns to earth.. the Earth twin is older. I read somewhere that when the twin do a reverse and returns to earth.. that's when he would see the Earth twin speeding up. But then... if he would still see the Earth twin as time dilating even when returning. How come when he returns to earth, the Earth twin becomes much older?
 
  • #4
Because there is acceleration involved.

If the twin that is traveling away from the Earth turns around at any point then there has to be some acceleration involved and the symmetry of the time dilation is broken. Once the acceleration happens General Relativity's time dilations tell you one will age and one won't (Special Relativity can also tell you this, but in a more complex way).
 
  • #5
Vorde said:
Because there is acceleration involved.

If the twin that is traveling away from the Earth turns around at any point then there has to be some acceleration involved and the symmetry of the time dilation is broken. Once the acceleration happens General Relativity's time dilations tell you one will age and one won't (Special Relativity can also tell you this, but in a more complex way).

So what would the traveling twin who turns around see on earth.. time dilating or speeding? If dilating.. you mean for every slow motion movement of the Earth twin, the Earth twin ages 2 years for example.. that is why when the traveling twin finally lands on earth.. the Earth twin is 50 years older?
 
  • #7
Tomahoc said:
Has any experiments been done equal to this scenerio where the twin leaving Earth and seeing Earth time dilated.. but when the twin reverses and returns to earth, the Earth speeds up or go in fast motion?

No experiment is needed. First of all, a traveling twin will anyway see this even in a Newtonian world. When he is traveling outward, any signals from the Earth-based twin will be red-shifted and give the impression that the Earth-based clock is slower. On return, the opposite Doppler effect will make the Earth clock appear faster. This has nothing to do with relativity.

I believe you are asking this question from the context of the 'twin paradox' resolution in SR.

This is not a correct interpretation/explanation of SR or the twin problem. In SR, the traveling twin is getting the 'relative time dilation' or 'differential aging' (aka time slowdown) throughout his/her journey relative to the stay-at-home twin. It is not as if there is no differential aging when the traveling twin is outbound, but it suddenly starts when he gets inbound. SR does not differentiate between inbound and outbound trajectories.

Instead of the above example, take the traveling twin's trajectory as a large circle starting and ending at Earth, at a constant velocity, with the stationary twin sitting as the diamond in the ring. The initial acceleration, the acceleration throughout the trajectory to maintain a circular path, and the final deceleration are of little importance in SR. Only the constant velocity throughtout the path is held responsible for the slower aging of the traveling twin.

Vorde said:
In special relativity, there is no 'speeding up of time'...

That's a little subjective. The traveling twin in the twin paradox will vouch for the fact that Earth's time speeded up during his little space-cruise.

Tomahoc said:
...I read somewhere that when the twin do a reverse and returns to earth.. that's when he would see the Earth twin speeding up...

'Seeing', as based on Doppler effect on signals being exchanged between the two, yes. As I mentioned above, this has nothing to do with relativity, and Newtonian mechanics will predict the same. Throughout the period of travel though, it is the traveling twin's clock which is 'actually' slowing down compared to the Earth based twin's clock, causing a real 'differential aging'. These two are often confused, because this type of argument is used to resolve the twin problem somewhat indiscriminately.

Vorde said:
Because there is acceleration involved.

If the twin that is traveling away from the Earth turns around at any point then there has to be some acceleration involved and the symmetry of the time dilation is broken. Once the acceleration happens General Relativity's time dilations tell you one will age and one won't (Special Relativity can also tell you this, but in a more complex way).

The acceleration breaks the symmetry, that is correct. Why the traveling twin ages slower because of that is not really explained in SR. It is something that was only found out in experiments like Hafele-Keating, GPS satellites and confirmed by lab experiments like Bailey et. al.

GR has no role in this. It can perhaps say which of them will age faster or slower during the acceleration, but that period is negligible in this scenario. Why the faster or slower aging will continue after the acceleration is gone, GR does not say. We have to depend on SR and experimental findings for that.

Tomahoc said:
So what would the traveling twin who turns around see on earth.. time dilating or speeding? If dilating.. you mean for every slow motion movement of the Earth twin, the Earth twin ages 2 years for example.. that is why when the traveling twin finally lands on earth.. the Earth twin is 50 years older?

He will 'see' the Earth clock speeding up based on Doppler effect. On the outward journey, he will similarly see the Earth clock slow down, though in fact his clock is actually running slower than the Earth clock. We need to distinguish between what is 'seen' based on signals at speed of light, as opposed to the differential aging that is really happening between the two clocks.

Vorde said:
Well I could explain it to you, but I'd just say read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox

In this, do not ignore the small section at the bottom on 'Explanation in terms of Mach's principle', just because it is a minority view. Minority views have been proven right at times.

This is not to say I am endorsing or supporting this particular minority view, but we should keep our minds open to the possibility that better explanations than the currently accepted ones may exist for situations like the 'twin paradox'.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Tomahoc, You've gotten a lot of help on this thread so far, but I thought it might also be helpful to you to see some diagrams that I made to illustrate how Time Dilation is different in different Inertial Reference Frames (IRF's) and yet the Relativistic Doppler, what each observer sees of the other ones clock, is the same in all IRF's.

Please see my diagrams on post #9 and on page 5 of this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=656922
 

1. What is a reverse dilation experiment?

A reverse dilation experiment is a scientific experiment where the dilation of a substance or material is reversed, meaning it is compressed or made smaller instead of being expanded. This can be done by applying pressure or changing the temperature.

2. What is the purpose of a reverse dilation experiment?

The purpose of a reverse dilation experiment is to understand the properties and behavior of materials when they are compressed or made smaller. This can provide valuable insights for various fields such as materials science, engineering, and physics.

3. How is a reverse dilation experiment conducted?

A reverse dilation experiment is conducted by first selecting a substance or material to be tested. Then, the substance is subjected to pressure or temperature changes to induce reverse dilation. The changes in size or volume of the substance are measured and recorded.

4. What are the potential applications of a reverse dilation experiment?

A reverse dilation experiment can have various applications, such as in the development of new materials that can withstand high pressure or temperature changes, in understanding the behavior of materials in extreme conditions, and in improving the efficiency of industrial processes that involve compression or shrinking of materials.

5. Are there any risks associated with conducting a reverse dilation experiment?

As with any scientific experiment, there may be some risks involved in conducting a reverse dilation experiment. These risks can include handling hazardous substances, exposure to high pressure or temperatures, and potential equipment malfunctions. It is important to follow proper safety protocols and use appropriate protective gear when conducting this type of experiment.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
646
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
899
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
31
Views
2K
Back
Top