- #1
Moridin
- 692
- 3
Do you think that violence is justified in order to stop violence?
Moridin said:Do you think that violence is justified in order to stop violence?
acting with or marked by or resulting from great force or energy or emotional intensity; "a violent attack"; "a violent person"; "violent feelings"; "a violent rage"; "felt a violent dislike"
This is a complex and controversial question, as there are many differing opinions and perspectives on the matter. Some believe that violence is never justified, while others argue that it can be necessary in certain situations. Ultimately, the justification for violence often depends on the specific circumstances and the moral values of the individuals involved.
In most cases, self-defense is considered a justifiable reason for violence. If someone is being physically threatened or attacked, they have the right to protect themselves and use force if necessary to defend themselves. However, it is important to note that the level of force used in self-defense should be proportional to the threat faced.
There are some who argue that violence can be used as a means to achieve a greater good, such as fighting against oppression or injustice. However, this is a controversial viewpoint as it raises questions about the ethics and effectiveness of using violence to achieve a specific goal.
The concept of "just war" is often used to justify violence in situations of war or conflict. It is based on the belief that there are certain criteria that must be met in order for a war to be considered just, such as a just cause and proportionality in the use of force. However, the application of these criteria can be subjective and open to interpretation.
Yes, there are alternative ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to violence. These include peaceful negotiations, mediation, and nonviolent resistance. While these methods may not always be successful, they can help to prevent the escalation of violence and promote a more peaceful resolution.