Is Violence Ever Justified, and What Causes It?

  • Thread starter Moridin
  • Start date
In summary: With enough understanding one can transcend the anger and understand the root of the problem, and then do what is necessary to correct it. In Summary, according to the speaker, violence is justified in order to stop violence. Justified violence is relative to the person who has been hurt by the initial violent act, and it does not exist in a conscious frame of reference apart from man. Violence is also justified against non-violence (depending on how you define violence). If one does not have access to authorities and is being imprisoned, blackmailed, or oppressed, violence may be the best action to secure one's freedom.
  • #1
Moridin
692
3
Do you think that violence is justified in order to stop violence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The question is not about violence, but about the meaning of justification
 
  • #3
Moridin said:
Do you think that violence is justified in order to stop violence?

yes, it is
 
  • #4
I don't care if it is justified or not, if someone comes at me or mine with the intent of bodily harm I will do whatever it takes to defend myself. However, I do share the sentiment of Isaac Asimov who said, "Violence is the last resort of the incompetent". If I do have to resort to violence I feel it is a failing on my part.
 
  • #5
justifications is a reason for action. If violence comes without a reason which is not violence, maybe violence is justified in order to stop it.

If the reason is violence, maybe all violence is justified or all not.
Otherwise if the problem which causes the violence can be solved nonviolently, why not to stop violence by solving the problem. If the problem can only be solved by violence, why do you resort to violence stop violence?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
There are three answers (solutions) to this problem.It is justified relative to the person who has been hurt by the initial violent act, but it is not justified to the person who initially caused the violence as that person would in no way would want to receive back violence. In a conscious frame of reference apart from man, it is neither justified nor unjustified, it does not exist!
 
  • #7
I think sometimes violence is even justified against non-violence (depending on how you define violence).

If you don't have access to authorities and you're being imprisoned, blackmailed, or somehow oppressed by somebody, violence may be the best action to secure your freedom.

Again, it depends on your definition of violent.

If we go with the standard:

acting with or marked by or resulting from great force or energy or emotional intensity; "a violent attack"; "a violent person"; "violent feelings"; "a violent rage"; "felt a violent dislike"

then somebody could poison you to death without being violent. Somebody could also hold you against your will without being violent. Violence may be the only way out for you.

So in my opinion, violence itself isn't bad, it's how it's used, just like anything else.
 
  • #8
Delete Succusion

When is justice violent? What justifies violence? What is violent justice? What justifies justice? Justice without violence reveals violence without justice, but justice with violence is a violent justice and a justified violence, and if that is so then when will violence stop? It most certainly wouldn't be the result of the bolded formerly defined just cause. For violence to stop, just must be only of a peacefull act in the mind of the Human Being. If one desires peace then one can not justify violence, for violence justified is not a peace at all, and to justify violence for thy own enemy is to create more of a war/attack that is already in place.

What is just about violence? Are we speaking of the currently rotted Human morality or of existential/universal cause and effect, that which are eternally perpetuated? The act(s) of bartered violence will only reciprocate and is only a reciprocation, and a weak one at that. Violence in a limited and enclosed system is weak and will eventually self destruct, love is strong, love is eternal.

Opinions are freely entitled and allowed as is alacrity and sumnolency, yet the consequences of and from actions and effects are a conscious one's endless prison or paradise rendered of personal choice by means of the macro environment and its decisions simultaneously through and of both the precedently mentioned.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
In an atmosphere of violence to defend onself is justified. What is more important to consider is why this atmosphere of violence has come about. What is it that turns a particular country, race, group into an enemy. Violence on a large scale as in a war only leads to further anger and hatred and oppression. Why is it that mankind despite being so "intellegent" is a slave to anger, the answer lies in understanding one-self.
 

1. When is violence justified?

This is a complex and controversial question, as there are many differing opinions and perspectives on the matter. Some believe that violence is never justified, while others argue that it can be necessary in certain situations. Ultimately, the justification for violence often depends on the specific circumstances and the moral values of the individuals involved.

2. Is self-defense considered a justifiable reason for violence?

In most cases, self-defense is considered a justifiable reason for violence. If someone is being physically threatened or attacked, they have the right to protect themselves and use force if necessary to defend themselves. However, it is important to note that the level of force used in self-defense should be proportional to the threat faced.

3. Can violence ever be used as a means to achieve a greater good?

There are some who argue that violence can be used as a means to achieve a greater good, such as fighting against oppression or injustice. However, this is a controversial viewpoint as it raises questions about the ethics and effectiveness of using violence to achieve a specific goal.

4. How does the concept of "just war" relate to justified violence?

The concept of "just war" is often used to justify violence in situations of war or conflict. It is based on the belief that there are certain criteria that must be met in order for a war to be considered just, such as a just cause and proportionality in the use of force. However, the application of these criteria can be subjective and open to interpretation.

5. Are there any alternatives to violence in resolving conflicts?

Yes, there are alternative ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to violence. These include peaceful negotiations, mediation, and nonviolent resistance. While these methods may not always be successful, they can help to prevent the escalation of violence and promote a more peaceful resolution.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
860
  • General Discussion
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
824
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
77
Views
12K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
4
Views
66
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top