Number Theory: Calculating mod large number


by mattmns
Tags: number, theory
mattmns
mattmns is offline
#1
Mar5-07, 05:53 PM
mattmns's Avatar
P: 1,119
Here is the original problem:
--------------
Use Euler's Theorem to compute the following:

[tex]3^{340} \ \text{mod} \ 341[/tex]
---------------

So Euler's Theorem tells us that if (a,m) = 1, then [tex]a^{\phi(m)} \equiv 1 \ \text{mod} \ m[/tex]


[itex]\phi(341) = \phi(11\cdot 31) = 300[/itex]

OK so now we need to compute [itex]3^{40} \ \text{mod} \ 341[/itex]. And this is where I have a problem.

Basically my problem is that I am trying to do it by hand, and I don't see how to do this easily. Sure I could pull out a calculator, but I don't think that should be necessary. So are there any tips for doing such a calculation? Our instructor suggested that we use powers of 2. Meaning that 40 = 32 + 8 = 2^5 + 2^3. However, this seems kind of ugly given the large moduli for this particular problem. Any ideas? Thanks!
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Lemurs match scent of a friend to sound of her voice
Repeated self-healing now possible in composite materials
'Heartbleed' fix may slow Web performance
JasonRox
JasonRox is offline
#2
Mar5-07, 07:36 PM
HW Helper
PF Gold
JasonRox's Avatar
P: 2,328
I'm interested in knowing how to tackle this by hand as well!
Dick
Dick is online now
#3
Mar6-07, 11:14 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,164
Well, Euler's theorem got you to 300. But I think you have to walk the rest of the way. Use the power of two idea and just start filling in by squaring the previous entry at each step and reducing mod 341.

3^2 -> 9
3^4 -> 81
3^8 -> ??
3^16 -> ??
3^32 -> ??

Once you have 8 and 32 multiply and reduce and you are done. I don't think thats too bad to do with a calculator.

mattmns
mattmns is offline
#4
Mar6-07, 11:24 AM
mattmns's Avatar
P: 1,119

Number Theory: Calculating mod large number


I was hoping to not have to use a calculator

I also ask because we had an exam a week ago, and we had to do basically the same computation (and it worked out to be 81^2, 81^4, etc, but it was mod 1000, which I thought was a little crazy considering we were not allowed calculators on the exam.) So basically I was just wondering if there was a nice, clever, way to do this.
Dick
Dick is online now
#5
Mar6-07, 11:35 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,164
That does sound sadistic. What exactly was the question?
mattmns
mattmns is offline
#6
Mar6-07, 11:39 AM
mattmns's Avatar
P: 1,119
I was probably missing some clever trick, but even when I asked the professor, he said to use powers of 2, so I don't know.

Here is the original question:
-------------
Find the remainder when [tex]3^{56}[/tex] is divided by 1000.
-------------

At the time we did not have Euler's Theorem (It probably would not help anyway). We did have fermat's theorem, but that does not apply here (I don't think at least). We basically had just general mod arithmetic.
Dick
Dick is online now
#7
Mar6-07, 12:28 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,164
I can't think of anything else either. I'll stick with sadistic.
tim_lou
tim_lou is offline
#8
Mar6-07, 08:32 PM
P: 689
actually, there is a generalized totient function call the Carmichael Function: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CarmichaelFunction.html

basically [tex]\lambda (340)=LCM(\lambda (11), \lambda (31))=30[/tex]

so that,
[tex]3^{30}\equiv 1 \mod{341}[/tex]

which easily gives,
[tex]a \equiv 56 \mod{341}[/tex]
the Carmichael Function theorem is in general much stronger than totient function theorem.


if you don't like carmichael function, you can always break the modulo into pieces.

basically, let
[tex]3^{340}\equiv a \mod{341}[/tex]

so
[tex]3^{340}\equiv a \mod{11}[/tex]

and
[tex]3^{340}\equiv a \mod{31}[/tex]

so

[tex]a \equiv 1 \mod{11}[/tex]
[tex]a \equiv 25 \mod{31}[/tex]

a=11k+1

[tex]11k \equiv 24 \mod{31}[/tex]
[tex]k \equiv 5 \mod{31}[/tex]

so
a=11((31*m)+5)+1
or

[tex]a \equiv 56 \mod{341}[/tex]
TROGLIO
TROGLIO is offline
#9
May21-11, 01:06 PM
P: 11
done by binomial theorem dunno mod theorem

3^56
(3^4)x(3^52)
81x(9^50)
81x[(10-1)]^50
or
81x[(1-10)]^50
81x[1+50x10+(50x49x100)/2 +(50x49x48x1000)/6 . . . . . 10^50]
from the 3rd term onwards al the trems are divisible by 1000 hence by dividing the first 2 terms by 1000 i wil get the remainder

taking 500 common in d first 2 terms
[81x(500)x246]/1000

81x246/2
81x123


answer
9963
is it right???
i dnt know modular theory
can someone help me wit it??
Dick
Dick is online now
#10
May21-11, 08:51 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,164
Quote Quote by TROGLIO View Post
done by binomial theorem dunno mod theorem

3^56
(3^4)x(3^52)
81x(9^50)
81x[(10-1)]^50
or
81x[(1-10)]^50
81x[1+50x10+(50x49x100)/2 +(50x49x48x1000)/6 . . . . . 10^50]
from the 3rd term onwards al the trems are divisible by 1000 hence by dividing the first 2 terms by 1000 i wil get the remainder

taking 500 common in d first 2 terms
[81x(500)x246]/1000

81x246/2
81x123


answer
9963
is it right???
i dnt know modular theory
can someone help me wit it??
That's actually a clever approach. But you don't need to factor the 81 out. And you are making some mistakes with your powers. Just work with 3^56=9^28=(1-10)^28. Now do the binomial expansion. Do it carefully this time. It's (1+x)^28 with x=(-10). You have some signs in the expansion.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
large number!! Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Computing a large number Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Is ln(1+exp(x)) = x when x is a large number? General Math 11
factoring a large number General Math 11
large number... Brain Teasers 3