Comparing UK and US PhD Programs in Physics and Mathematics

  • Thread starter Homotopic
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Uk
In summary, Cambridge has an excellent physics and mathematics department, making it a desirable choice for those considering a PhD after completing a MSc or equivalent. However, finding funding for a PhD program at Cambridge can be challenging. On the other hand, universities in the US, such as Harvard, offer full funding programs for their students. When it comes to choosing between a top UK university like Cambridge and a top US university like Harvard, there are some general differences to consider. US PhD programs tend to be longer and have a more formal learning component, which can be beneficial for students planning to continue in research. However, the shorter duration of UK PhD programs may put students at a disadvantage when it comes to competing for academic positions in the global market.
  • #1
Homotopic
8
0
Cambridge has one of the best physics/mathematics departments in the world. Studying there would probably be a desire for anyone considering a PhD after a MSc or something equivalent. But once you are admitted, you need to find funding, which is even much harder than being accepted, (read on several sites).

Now I was looking into US universities. Harvard has a full funding programme for anyone who studies there and I expect the other league ones to offer same opportunities.

Theoretical physics with as much maths as possible - what would you recommend? Is there a big difference between UK leading unis like cambridge and e.g. Harvard? Are there reasons to choose for a US uni instead of cambridge (in the ultimate scenario you get an offer from both)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Most US universities will offer funding if they accept you, at least in physics. I'm not sure about mathematics.
 
  • #3
I don't know how things are done exactly in Cambridge, but I believe there are some significant general differences between PhD programs in the UK and in the US. For a start PhDs in America take longer on average, and my impression is that they generally have a more significant formal learning component before independent research begins, though obviously independent learning is still required. In many ways the shorter duration of UK courses is a disadvantage for the student intending to continue in research, as a longer course allows the student to be more competitive upon qualification, in terms of knowledge and publication record. The 2010 EPSRC http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publications/reports/InternationalReviewOfMathematicalSciences.pdf on mathematics, for example, contains the disturbing, for me at least, statement "The most worrying factor in education and training is that, to a large extent, UK PhDs are not competitive for academic positions in today’s global market."
 

1. What are the main differences between the UK and US approaches to physics and mathematics?

The UK and US approaches to physics and mathematics have several distinct differences. In the UK, the focus is on theoretical and fundamental research, while in the US, there is a greater emphasis on applied research and innovation. Additionally, the UK tends to have a more structured and specialized curriculum, while the US offers a broader range of elective courses. Finally, the funding and support for research in the two countries also differ, with the US typically having more resources available.

2. Are there any notable differences in the educational system for physics and mathematics in the UK and US?

Yes, there are significant differences in the educational systems for physics and mathematics in the UK and US. In the UK, students typically specialize in a specific subject from an early age, whereas in the US, students have more flexibility in choosing their courses. Additionally, the UK has a more centralized education system, while the US has a more decentralized approach with considerable variation between states and institutions.

3. How do the research environments in the UK and US compare for physics and mathematics?

The research environments in the UK and US have some similarities but also notable differences. Both countries have highly respected universities and research institutions, but the US tends to have more resources and funding available. The UK, on the other hand, has a more collaborative research culture, with a strong emphasis on interdisciplinary work.

4. Are there any notable differences in the career opportunities for physics and mathematics in the UK and US?

Yes, there are some differences in the career opportunities for physics and mathematics in the UK and US. In the UK, there is a strong focus on academic careers, with many physicists and mathematicians working in universities and research institutions. In the US, there are more opportunities for industry jobs, particularly in the technology and engineering sectors.

5. How does the funding for physics and mathematics research differ between the UK and US?

The funding for physics and mathematics research varies between the UK and US. In the UK, most funding comes from government sources, such as the Science and Technology Facilities Council and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. In the US, funding comes from a combination of government agencies, private foundations, and industry sponsorships. Additionally, the US tends to have more funding available for research compared to the UK.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
630
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
513
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
115
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
736
Back
Top