- #1
Joel
- 100
- 1
Hello,
I will be 22 at the start of term and I need help in deciding if I should pursue a (3 + 2 years) masters degree in Biotechnology or Engineering Physics. Both programs sound very interesting and they are at reputable schools in Scandinavia, but I am worried about the amount of mathematics. I am afraid that the Biotich program does not offer enough courses in mathematics (and physics) to do research like this: http://www.theochem.kth.se/research/ (where most researchers are physicists, yet they belong to the Department of Biotechnology). On the other hand, I am no genius in mathematics and the amount of it in the Eng. Phys. program honestly intimidates me.
So, I wonder how math and physics intensive are topics like molecular modeling, biophysics, bio- and nanomaterial development, various NMR and MRI methods, and other topics between the two fields? Am I correct in assuming that it will be easier to learn the required molecular biology and biochemistry on my own with a background in math and physics than vise versa?
If I where right out of high school I think I'd pick Eng. Physics, but as it is, my dream is an academic career and I don't think I can afford to change program and loose another year anymore, where I not to succeed in the math courses. Simply put, I see the biotech option as a safe alternative and the eng. phys. program as an win-much-loose-much option.
I will be very gratefully for any comments or new perspectives! Thank you very much in advance.
Links to the programs:
Bio. Tech: http://www.kth.se/eng/education/programmes/master_engineering/biotechnology_180.html
Eng. Phys: http://www.tkk.fi/Units/EngineeringPhysics/studies.html (Only a short description, no course list easily available in English).
Joel
I will be 22 at the start of term and I need help in deciding if I should pursue a (3 + 2 years) masters degree in Biotechnology or Engineering Physics. Both programs sound very interesting and they are at reputable schools in Scandinavia, but I am worried about the amount of mathematics. I am afraid that the Biotich program does not offer enough courses in mathematics (and physics) to do research like this: http://www.theochem.kth.se/research/ (where most researchers are physicists, yet they belong to the Department of Biotechnology). On the other hand, I am no genius in mathematics and the amount of it in the Eng. Phys. program honestly intimidates me.
So, I wonder how math and physics intensive are topics like molecular modeling, biophysics, bio- and nanomaterial development, various NMR and MRI methods, and other topics between the two fields? Am I correct in assuming that it will be easier to learn the required molecular biology and biochemistry on my own with a background in math and physics than vise versa?
If I where right out of high school I think I'd pick Eng. Physics, but as it is, my dream is an academic career and I don't think I can afford to change program and loose another year anymore, where I not to succeed in the math courses. Simply put, I see the biotech option as a safe alternative and the eng. phys. program as an win-much-loose-much option.
I will be very gratefully for any comments or new perspectives! Thank you very much in advance.
Links to the programs:
Bio. Tech: http://www.kth.se/eng/education/programmes/master_engineering/biotechnology_180.html
Eng. Phys: http://www.tkk.fi/Units/EngineeringPhysics/studies.html (Only a short description, no course list easily available in English).
Joel
Last edited by a moderator: