Explore Formation of Bound State in a Delta-Function Potential Well

In summary, the conversation discusses the formation of a bound state for a particle exposed to a 1D delta-function potential well situated near an impenetrable potential wall. The potential energy is given by V(x)=+\infty for x<0 and -C\delta(x-a) for 0<x<\infty, where a>0 specifies the position of the potential well and C>0 its strength. The (transcendental) equation for determining the energy of the bound state is derived and possible restrictions on the value of C for a bound state to exist are explored. Simple physical arguments are also discussed to rationalize the results.
  • #1
Wavefunction
99
4

Homework Statement



We learned in class that a particle exposed to a 1D delta-function potential well would
always have a single bound state. Let us now explore this question for the case where the
delta-function potential well is situated in the vicinity of the impenetrable potential wall:
Given the potential energy:

[itex]V(x)=\begin{cases}
+\infty,\quad\text{for}\quad x<0\\
-C\delta(x-a),\quad\text{for}\quad 0<x<\infty
\end{cases}[/itex]

Explore the formation of a bound state for a particle of mass m by solving the time independent
Schrödinger equation. Here [itex]a > 0[/itex] specifies the position of the potential well
and [itex]C > 0[/itex] its strength.
(a) Find the (transcendental) equation that would allow you to determine the energy of the
bound state. Indicate how you would be solving this equation graphically.
(b) In the absence of the neighboring wall (think if this may correspond to the limit [itex]a\rightarrow\infty [/itex]),
the bound state is formed for any value of strength [itex]C[/itex]. But now, do we have a restriction
on the value of [itex]C[/itex] for a bound state to exist? If so, what is the minimal possible value
of [itex]C[/itex] in terms of other given parameters of the problem?
(c) Can you bring simple physical arguments to rationalize the results in item (b)?

Homework Equations



Eqn 1):[itex]\frac{d^2\psi(x)}{dx^2}-\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}[V(x)-E]\psi(x)=0[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Part a):

First since the well is centered at [itex]x=a[/itex] I'll split the [itex]x[/itex]-axis into two regions:

Region 1: [itex]0<x<a[/itex]

Region 2: [itex]x>a[/itex]

Next since I'll setup my finite well of strength [itex]C[/itex]:

Let the well have a width of [itex]2\varepsilon[/itex]. Then it's depth is [itex]\frac{C}{2\varepsilon}[/itex]. So [itex] C [/itex] must have dimensions of (J)(m). Let [itex] C=V_0(2\varepsilon) [/itex] Where the well has a maximum depth of [itex]-V_0[/itex]. The well has its walls at [itex]x=a\pm\varepsilon[/itex]. In order for a bound state to exist [itex]E<0[/itex]. So there are two cases to consider within the well:

Case I: A particle with energy [itex]E[/itex]

[itex]\frac{d^2\psi(x)}{dx^2}+\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}[E]\psi(x)=0[/itex]

Let [itex]\kappa^2=-\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{d^2\psi(x)}{dx^2}-\kappa^2\psi(x)=0[/itex]

Which has solutions of [itex]C_1e^{\kappa x}[/itex]and[itex]C_2e^{-\kappa x}[/itex]

Case II: A particle with energy [itex] -V_0-E[/itex]

[itex]\frac{d^2\psi(x)}{dx^2}-\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}[-V_0-E]\psi(x)=0[/itex]

Let [itex] k^2=\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}[V_0+E][/itex]

[itex]\frac{d^2\psi(x)}{dx^2}+k^2\psi(x)=0[/itex]

which has solutions of [itex]C_3\cos(kx)[/itex]and[itex]C_4\sin(kx)[/itex]

Now I can impose my boundary conditions:

In Region 1; [itex]\psi_{I}(0)=0[/itex]
[itex]\psi_{I}(a-\varepsilon)=\psi_{II}(a-\varepsilon)[/itex]
[itex]\psi'_{I}(a-\varepsilon)=\psi'_{II}(a-\varepsilon)[/itex]

In Region 2; [itex] \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\psi_{I}(x)=0[/itex]
[itex]\psi_{I}(a+\varepsilon)=\psi_{II}(a+\varepsilon)[/itex]
[itex]\psi'_{I}(a+\varepsilon)=\psi'_{II}(a+\varepsilon)[/itex]

Let [itex]a'=a-\varepsilon[/itex] and [itex] a''=a+\varepsilon[/itex]

Now to solve the TISE in Region 1:

[itex]\psi_{I}(x)=C_1e^{\kappa x}+C_2e^{-\kappa x}[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{II}(x)=C_3\cos(kx)+C_4\sin(kx)[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{I}(0)=0=C_1+C_2\Rightarrow C_2=-C_1[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{I}(x) = C_1[e^{\kappa x}-e^{-\kappa x}][/itex]

Now I'll select an even function from [itex]\psi_{II}(x)[/itex](Letting [itex]C_4=0[/itex]). Such that [itex]\psi_{II}(x)=C_3\cos(kx)[/itex]

Using my B.Cs:

[itex]\psi_{I}(a')=\psi_{II}(a')[/itex]

Eqn 2:[itex] C_1[e^{\kappa a'}-e^{-\kappa a'}]=C_3\cos(ka')[/itex]

[itex]\psi'_{I}(a')=\psi'_{II}(a')[/itex]

Eqn 3:[itex] C_1\kappa[e^{\kappa a'}+e^{-\kappa a'}] = -C_3k\sin(ka') [/itex]

Dividing Eqn 3 by Eqn 2:

Eqn 4: [itex]\kappa\frac{e^{\kappa a'}+e^{-\kappa a'}}{e^{\kappa a'}-e^{-\kappa a'}}=-k\tan(ka')[/itex]

or equivalently

Eqn 4:[itex]\kappa a'\tanh(\kappa a')=-ka'\tan(ka')[/itex]

Now I'll select an odd function from [itex]\psi_{II}(x)[/itex](Letting [itex]C_3=0[/itex]). Such that [itex]\psi_{II}(x)=C_4\sin(kx)[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{I}(a')=\psi_{II}(a')[/itex]

Eqn 5:[itex] C_1[e^{\kappa a'}-e^{-\kappa a'}]=C_4\sin(ka')[/itex]

[itex]\psi'_{I}(a')=\psi'_{II}(a')[/itex]

Eqn 6:[itex] C_1\kappa[e^{\kappa a'}+e^{-\kappa a'}] = C_4k\cos(ka') [/itex]

Dividing Eqn 3 by Eqn 2:

Eqn 7: [itex]\kappa\frac{e^{\kappa a'}+e^{-\kappa a'}}{e^{\kappa a'}-e^{-\kappa a'}}=k\cot(ka')[/itex]

or equivalently

Eqn 7:[itex]\kappa a'\tanh(\kappa a')=ka'\cot(ka')[/itex]

Now to solve the TISE in Region 2:

[itex]\psi_{I}(x)=C_5e^{\kappa x}+C_6e^{-\kappa x}[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{II}(x)=C_7\cos(kx)+C_8\sin(kx)[/itex]

[itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\psi_{I}(x)=0\Rightarrow C_5=0[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{I}(x)=C_6e^{-\kappa x}[/itex]

Again I'll start with the even solution [itex]\psi_{II}(x)=C_7\cos(kx)[/itex]

[itex]\psi_{I}(a'')=\psi_{II}(a'')[/itex]

Eqn 8:[itex]C_6e^{-\kappa a''}=C_7\cos(ka'')[/itex]

[itex]\psi'_{I}(a'')=\psi'_{II}(a'')[/itex]

Eqn 9: [itex]-C_6\kappa e^{-\kappa a''}=-C_7k\sin(ka'')[/itex]

Dividing Eqn 9 by Eqn 8:

Eqn 10: [itex] \kappa a''=ka''\tan(ka'')[/itex]

Now for the odd portion of [itex] \psi_{II}(x)[/itex].

[itex]\psi_{I}(a'')=\psi_{II}(a'')[/itex]

Eqn 11:[itex]C_6e^{-\kappa a''}=C_8\sin(ka'')[/itex]

[itex]\psi'_{I}(a'')=\psi'_{II}(a'')[/itex]

Eqn 12: [itex]-C_6\kappa e^{-\kappa a''}=C_8k\cos(ka'')[/itex]

Dividing Eqn 12 by Eqn 11:

Eqn 13: [itex] -\kappa a''=ka''\cot(ka'')[/itex]

I also have that:

Eqn 14: [itex] \kappa^2+k^2=\frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2}[/itex]

[itex]\kappa=\sqrt{\frac{2mV_0}{\hbar^2}-k^2}[/itex]

Eqn 15: [itex]\kappa a'=\sqrt{\frac{2mV_0(a')^2}{\hbar^2}-(ka')^2}[/itex]

Eqn 16: [itex]\kappa a''=\sqrt{\frac{2mV_0(a'')^2}{\hbar^2}-(ka'')^2}[/itex]

At this point I'm a little lost as to what I need to do to get a single transcendental equation; however, here is how I think I should proceed:

1) for all equations sub in the expressions for [itex]a'[/itex] and [itex]a''[/itex] in terms of [itex] a [/itex]
2) use eqns 15 and 16 to get an expression for [itex]\kappa a[/itex]
3) for regions 1 and 2 plot odd and even solutions in terms of [itex] \kappa a[/itex]
(Edit: actually I just realized since [itex]\varepsilon[/itex] is small I can take [itex]\varepsilon^2[/itex] to be [itex]0[/itex] so what I'll end up with is just [itex]\kappa a = \sqrt{\frac{V_0}{\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma^2}}-(ka)^2}[/itex]) I'm still not sure how to resolve the transcendental equations in regions 1 and 2 though. Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Instead of treating the delta distribution as a limit of a square potential, I suggest using it as it is and infer from this the boundary condition that must be fulfilled (in addition to continuity) by the wave function at x = a. You will then only have one matching to perform.
 
  • #3
Orodruin said:
Instead of treating the delta distribution as a limit of a square potential, I suggest using it as it is and infer from this the boundary condition that must be fulfilled (in addition to continuity) by the wave function at x = a. You will then only have one matching to perform.

I'm not sure how to deal directly with the delta function potential. The way we dealt with such a potential in class was to construct such a finite square well. Though I'm curious to hear more about your approach. Thank you for the reply :)
 
  • #4
The idea is to integrate the Schrodinger equation from ##a-\varepsilon## to ##a+\varepsilon## and take the limit as ##\varepsilon \to 0^+##. That'll give you the condition ##\psi'(x)## has to satisfy at the boundary.
 
  • Like
Likes Wavefunction
  • #5
vela said:
The idea is to integrate the Schrodinger equation from ##a-\varepsilon## to ##a+\varepsilon## and take the limit as ##\varepsilon \to 0^+##. That'll give you the condition ##\psi'(x)## has to satisfy at the boundary.
Thank you I'll reformulate my problem and post my solution later :)
 
  • #6
[itex] \lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{x=a-\varepsilon}^{a+\varepsilon}\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}-C\delta(x-a)\psi(x)dx=\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}\int_{x=a-\varepsilon}^{a+\varepsilon}E\psi(x)dx [/itex]

[itex] \lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}[\psi'(a+\varepsilon)-\psi'(a-\varepsilon)]=\frac{2mC}{\hbar^2}\psi(a)[/itex]

Now in region 1: [itex]\psi_{I}(x)=C_1e^{\kappa x}+C_2e^{-\kappa x}[/itex]

applying the B.C in region 1 of [itex]\psi_{I}(0)=0\Rightarrow C_2=-C_1[/itex]

Then [itex]\psi_{I}(x)=C_1(e^{\kappa x}-e^{-\kappa x})[/itex]

Now for region 2: [itex] \psi_{I}(x)=C_3e^{-\kappa x} [/itex]

which satisfies in region 2: [itex] \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\psi_{I}(x)=0[/itex]

Now [itex]\psi_{I}(x)[/itex] must be continuous at [itex]x=a[/itex] so

[itex] C_1(e^{\kappa a}-e^{-\kappa a})=C_3e^{-\kappa a} [/itex]

[itex] C_1=C_3\frac{e^{-\kappa a} }{e^{\kappa a}-e^{-\kappa a}} [/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #7
In region 1: [itex]\psi'_{I}(a-\varepsilon)=C_3\frac{e^{-\kappa a}}{e^{\kappa a}-e^{-\kappa a}}\kappa(e^{\kappa(a-\varepsilon)}+e^{-\kappa(a-\varepsilon)})[/itex]

In region 2: [itex] \psi'_{I}(a+\varepsilon)=-C_3\kappa e^{-\kappa a}[/itex]

So [itex]\lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}[\psi'_{I}(a+\varepsilon)-\psi'_{I}(a-\varepsilon)]=-\frac{2mC}{\hbar^2}C_3e^{-\kappa a}[/itex]

Which becomes [itex] \lim_{\varepsilon\rightarrow0}[(-C_3\kappa e^{-\kappa (a+\epsilon)})-(C_3\frac{e^{-\kappa a}}{e^{\kappa a}-e^{-\kappa a}}\kappa(e^{\kappa(a-\varepsilon)}+e^{-\kappa(a-\varepsilon)}))]=-\frac{2mC}{\hbar^2}C_3e^{-\kappa a}[/itex]

[itex][(-C_3\kappa e^{-\kappa a})-(C_3\frac{e^{-\kappa a}}{e^{\kappa a}-e^{-\kappa a}}\kappa(e^{\kappa a}+e^{-\kappa a}))]=-\frac{2mC}{\hbar^2}C_3e^{-\kappa a}[/itex]

Finally,

[itex][(\kappa)+(\frac{1}{e^{\kappa a}-e^{-\kappa a}}\kappa(e^{\kappa a}+e^{-\kappa a}))]=\frac{2mC}{\hbar^2}[/itex]

Which as [itex] a\rightarrow\infty [/itex] gives me [itex] \kappa = \frac{mC}{\hbar^2} [/itex]
 
  • #8
Looks good. You could simplify the algebra a bit if you used
\begin{eqnarray*}
\psi_I(x) &= A\sinh ka \\
\psi_{II}(x) &= Be^{-ka}
\end{eqnarray*} In terms of hyperbolic trig functions, your transcendental equation is
$$k(1+\coth ka) = \frac{2mC}{\hbar^2}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Wavefunction
  • #9
Awesome thanks for help everyone! :) Cheers
 

1. What is a delta-function potential well?

A delta-function potential well is a simplified model used in quantum mechanics to describe the behavior of a particle in a potential well that is infinitely narrow and infinitely deep at a specific point.

2. How does a delta-function potential well form?

A delta-function potential well forms when there is a sudden change in the potential energy of a particle, such as when a particle moves from a region of high potential energy to a region of lower potential energy.

3. What is the significance of the bound state in a delta-function potential well?

The bound state in a delta-function potential well refers to the state of a particle being confined within the potential well due to the infinite potential at the center. This has important implications for the behavior and energy levels of the particle.

4. How does the bound state in a delta-function potential well differ from other potential wells?

The bound state in a delta-function potential well differs from other potential wells in that it is a purely mathematical construct and does not accurately represent physical systems. However, it serves as a useful model for understanding certain aspects of quantum mechanics.

5. What is the role of the delta-function potential well in quantum mechanics?

The delta-function potential well is a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics and is often used as a starting point for studying more complex systems. It allows for the exploration of important principles such as energy levels, wave functions, and the uncertainty principle.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
836
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top