Has a Deep Field Picture of the Sky Been Captured with a Radio Telescope?

  • Stargazing
  • Thread starter zuz
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Picture Sky
  • #1
zuz
83
32
Has anyone ever taken a "deep field" picture of the sky, like Hubble, but with a radio telescope?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Some of the early radio astronomical survey mapping was done by telescopes like "Big Ear" in the North, or by the Mills Cross in the South.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_University_Radio_Observatory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mills_Cross_Telescope

To get deeper detailed images of smaller areas, requires VLBI, with international collaboration. The construction of detailed radio images, from the VLBI time data, requires intensive numerical processing. An optical image can be accumulated, on an image sensor array, which is a faster parallel process.
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
  • #3
Baluncore said:
To get deeper detailed images of smaller areas, requires VLBI, with international collaboration. The construction of detailed radio images, from the VLBI time data, requires intensive numerical processing. An optical image can be accumulated, on an image sensor array, which is a faster parallel process.
All that exists at FAST but all publications I could find from them were pulsars and FRB and again pulsars, i.e. only the sources that were very bright for the telescope. I wonder whether this is for a reason or due to the relatively young age of FAST.
 
  • #4
fresh_42 said:
All that exists at FAST but all publications I could find from them were pulsars and FRB and again pulsars, i.e. only the sources that were very bright for the telescope.
Deep sky observations require high sensitivity and high resolution. Unfortunately, man-made interference, and nearby bright sources, raise the noise floor of the synthesised images.

The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), operating alone, is a single location observatory. Resolution is limited by the 500 metre diameter. FAST finds more pulsars because it has a larger aperture area, and therefore has higher sensitivity than earlier observatories. It can make point measurements, where the signal is the sum of all the beam energy. That is suited to strong signals, or pulsar observations, not deep sky.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-hundred-meter_Aperture_Spherical_Telescope

The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) has a distributed aperture, so should have over 1000 times the resolution of FAR, since SKA is designed to operate as a long baseline interferometer. That would be more suited to deep sky observations, if you can find and fund the computer time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_Kilometre_Array

FAST is located at about 26° North, and zenith limited, so is restricted to the northern sky. It is not as steerable as the elements of the SKA.
The SKA is based in Africa and Australia, with many more steerable elements. It is better positioned to observe the southern sky with the best view of the Milky Way.
 
  • Informative
Likes fresh_42
  • #6
Thank you. That is just what I was looking for.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and berkeman

1. What is a deep field picture in the context of radio astronomy?

A deep field picture in radio astronomy refers to a highly detailed image of a distant, small area of the sky, captured using a radio telescope. These images are taken over extended periods, allowing the telescope to collect faint radio signals from distant cosmic sources, providing insights into the structure and evolution of the universe.

2. Has a radio telescope ever captured a deep field picture of the sky?

Yes, radio telescopes have captured deep field images of the sky. Projects like the Very Large Array (VLA), LOFAR (Low-Frequency Array), and the upcoming Square Kilometre Array (SKA) have produced or are expected to produce deep field images that reveal the radio frequency aspect of celestial bodies and phenomena not visible in optical wavelengths.

3. What are the challenges in capturing a deep field picture with a radio telescope?

Capturing a deep field picture with a radio telescope involves several challenges. These include the need for very long observation times to gather enough data, dealing with interference from Earth-based sources of radio frequency, and the technical complexity of processing and interpreting the vast amounts of data collected. Additionally, the atmosphere and ionosphere can distort radio waves, which requires sophisticated correction techniques.

4. What kind of objects can be observed in a radio telescope deep field image?

In a radio telescope deep field image, a variety of astronomical objects can be observed including distant galaxies, quasars, and galaxy clusters. These images can also reveal phenomena such as cosmic jets, supernova remnants, and interstellar gas clouds. Radio observations are particularly good at picking up emissions from neutral hydrogen, the most abundant element in the universe, which is crucial for studying the early universe.

5. How do the findings from radio telescope deep field images contribute to our understanding of the universe?

The findings from deep field images captured by radio telescopes contribute significantly to our understanding of the universe. They help astronomers study the cosmic evolution, including the formation and growth of galaxies, the behavior of black holes, and the large-scale structure of the cosmos. These images also provide crucial data for testing theories about dark matter and dark energy and the overall dynamics of the universe.

Similar threads

Stargazing What did I capture?
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
213
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
168
Back
Top