Maximum radius given rps, static and kinetic friction coefficients

In summary: In this case, the static coefficient of friction is 1.3, so when the pizza crumb is at rest on the disk, there is a maximum amount of resistance against the disk and it doesn't move. When the disk starts to rotate, the pizza crumb is slowly pulled in different directions. The pizza crumb doesn't have enough centripetal force to keep it stationary, so it slowly starts to move towards the center of the disk. The maximum radius for the pizza crumb is when it is at the center of the disk, which is 552.93 radians.
  • #1
tehnexus
2
0

Homework Statement



A computer scientist has dropped a tiny pizza crumb onto a magnetic disk. Later, when it's turned on, the disk is rotating at 88 revolutions per second about its axis, which is vertical. The coefficients of kinetic and static friction between pizza crumbs and the disk are 1.3 and 1.5 respectively. What is the maximum radius from the axis at which a pizza crumb will stay on the disk?

Homework Equations



F=ma, a=v^2/r, v=rω

The Attempt at a Solution



i really am not sure how to do this question, am i supposed to equate the centripetal force on the crumb with the frictional force? i have converted the rps to rad/s which is 552.93. please help me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are a couple of things to consider here. The first thing is understanding the forces on the object.
[itex] F_M = \mu_s * F_N [/itex]
[itex]F_M = [/itex] Maximum force of friction
[itex]\mu_s = [/itex] Static coefficient of friction
[itex]F_N = [/itex] Normal force

Static friction doesn't always produce a force. It only produces a force up to a maximum in opposition to motion on a plane. Now you already mentioned centripetal force. This is the force that is required to make something rotate. If you don't have enough centripetal force, then you don't have a solid orbit. Normal force is perpendicular to the plane of motion. Can you think of any forces that are perpendicular to the plane of motion? Basically what we need to find is what horizontal centripetal force exceeds the perpendicular normal force times the coefficient.

F = ma

We don't know the mass, but we know the forces in question are applied to the same mass, so what matters is the acceleration. If you can figure out an acceleration acting perpendicular to the disc, then you should be able to find the maximum horizontal acceleration toward the center that can occur with the static coefficient of friction.
 
  • #3
So the kinetic friction coefficient does not affect the question? but i understand what you are saying thanks.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Correct. Static friction is a ratio that represents how well two things are stuck together. It is all that applies until we have movement between the objects. Once we have movement you kind of get a skipping motion on the microscopic level. Think of it like two pieces of metal that have fitting triangular teeth on their surface. If you press against them and push, they will stay together. If you ever managed to push hard enough the teeth would start to skip against each other, and the amount of resistance in that skipping is less than when they fully fit together. That is why we need to numbers. We need one for when things are fully fit together and move as one, and one for when they start to slip and skip against each other.
 
Last edited:
  • #5


I would approach this problem by first understanding the physical principles involved. In this case, we have a rotating disk and a tiny pizza crumb that is subject to both static and kinetic friction.

To determine the maximum radius at which the crumb will stay on the disk, we can use the equation F=ma, where F is the net force acting on the crumb, m is the mass of the crumb, and a is the acceleration of the crumb. In this case, the net force on the crumb is the difference between the centripetal force (mv^2/r) and the frictional force (μmg), where μ is the friction coefficient, m is the mass of the crumb, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and r is the radius.

Setting the net force equal to zero, we can solve for the maximum radius:

mv^2/r - μmg = 0

r = mv^2/μmg

Now, we need to determine the value of the velocity (v) at the maximum radius. We can use the equation v=rω, where ω is the angular velocity of the disk. Substituting this into the equation above, we get:

r = (rω)^2/μmg

Solving for r, we get:

r = √(μmg/ω^2)

Now, we can substitute the given values into this equation to get the maximum radius at which the crumb will stay on the disk:

r = √(1.3*9.8/552.93^2) = 0.00016 meters

Therefore, the maximum radius at which the crumb will stay on the disk is approximately 0.00016 meters.
 

1. What is the formula for calculating maximum radius given rps?

The formula for calculating maximum radius is: R = (9.81 * rps^2) / (2 * pi^2 * (uk + us)). Where R is the maximum radius, rps is the revolutions per second, and uk and us are the kinetic and static friction coefficients respectively.

2. How do the static and kinetic friction coefficients affect the maximum radius?

The static and kinetic friction coefficients have an inverse relationship with the maximum radius. As the friction coefficients increase, the maximum radius decreases. This is because higher friction coefficients result in more resistance and therefore require a smaller radius for the object to maintain a constant speed.

3. How does the revolution per second (rps) affect the maximum radius?

The revolution per second (rps) has a direct relationship with the maximum radius. As the rps increases, the maximum radius increases as well. This is because a higher rps means the object is moving at a faster speed and therefore requires a larger radius to maintain a constant speed.

4. Can the maximum radius be calculated if the friction coefficients are unknown?

No, the maximum radius cannot be accurately calculated if the friction coefficients are unknown. The friction coefficients play a crucial role in determining the maximum radius and without them, the calculation would be incomplete.

5. Are there any assumptions made when using the formula for calculating maximum radius?

Yes, there are some assumptions made when using the formula for calculating maximum radius. These include assuming a constant speed, a circular path, and neglecting other factors such as air resistance and the shape of the object. These assumptions may affect the accuracy of the calculation.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
33
Views
972
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
241
Back
Top