- #1
Master1022
- 611
- 117
- Homework Statement
- Derive the mean and the variance of the exponential distribution using the Fourier transform
- Relevant Equations
- ## FT[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-j\omega t} dt ##
Hi,
I was just thinking about different ways to use the Fourier transform in other areas of mathematics. I am not sure whether this is the correct forum, but it is related to probability so I thought I ought to put it here.
Question: Is the following method an appropriate way to calculate the mean and variance of the exponential distribution? Have I overlooked any technicalities to get to the result?
I know that the standard proof isn't hard, but I was wondering whether there are faster ways (saves having to do the integration by parts)
Approach:
So we use the following principles for the Fourier transform:
## FT[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-j\omega t} dt = F(\omega) ##
## FT[t^n f(t)] = j^n \frac{d^n F}{d\omega^n} ##
Using the second relation, we can see that:
$$ E[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} tf(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j \frac{d F}{d\omega} |_{\omega = 0} $$
and
$$ E[f^2] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t^2 f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} tf(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j^2 \frac{d^2 F}{d\omega^2} |_{\omega = 0} $$
We have ## f(t) = \lambda e^{-\lambda t} u(t) ## (0 for ## t < 0 ##) and we have the standard result that ## FT[e^{-at} u(t)] = \frac{1}{a+j\omega} ##. Therefore,
$$ FT[ \lambda e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} $$
and
$$ E[f] = FT[ \lambda t e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = j \frac{d }{d\omega} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} \right)|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{\lambda}{(\lambda + j \omega)^2}|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{1}{\lambda} $$
Now we can do
$$ E[f^2] = FT[ \lambda t^2 e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = j^2 \frac{d^2 }{d\omega^2} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} \right)|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{2 \lambda}{(\lambda + j \omega)^3}|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{2}{\lambda^2} $$
Finally we can use: ## Var[f] = E[f^2] - (E[f])^2 = \frac{2}{\lambda^2} - \frac{1}{\lambda^2} = \frac{1}{\lambda^2} ##
which yields the expected result.
Have I overlooked any details along the way or is this a valid way to derive the required quantities?
Thanks.
I was just thinking about different ways to use the Fourier transform in other areas of mathematics. I am not sure whether this is the correct forum, but it is related to probability so I thought I ought to put it here.
Question: Is the following method an appropriate way to calculate the mean and variance of the exponential distribution? Have I overlooked any technicalities to get to the result?
I know that the standard proof isn't hard, but I was wondering whether there are faster ways (saves having to do the integration by parts)
Approach:
So we use the following principles for the Fourier transform:
## FT[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-j\omega t} dt = F(\omega) ##
## FT[t^n f(t)] = j^n \frac{d^n F}{d\omega^n} ##
Using the second relation, we can see that:
$$ E[f(t)] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} tf(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j \frac{d F}{d\omega} |_{\omega = 0} $$
and
$$ E[f^2] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t^2 f(t) dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} tf(t) e^{-j(0) t} dt = j^2 \frac{d^2 F}{d\omega^2} |_{\omega = 0} $$
We have ## f(t) = \lambda e^{-\lambda t} u(t) ## (0 for ## t < 0 ##) and we have the standard result that ## FT[e^{-at} u(t)] = \frac{1}{a+j\omega} ##. Therefore,
$$ FT[ \lambda e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} $$
and
$$ E[f] = FT[ \lambda t e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = j \frac{d }{d\omega} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} \right)|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{\lambda}{(\lambda + j \omega)^2}|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{1}{\lambda} $$
Now we can do
$$ E[f^2] = FT[ \lambda t^2 e^{-\lambda t} u(t)] = j^2 \frac{d^2 }{d\omega^2} \left( \frac{\lambda}{\lambda+j\omega} \right)|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{2 \lambda}{(\lambda + j \omega)^3}|_{\omega = 0} = \frac{2}{\lambda^2} $$
Finally we can use: ## Var[f] = E[f^2] - (E[f])^2 = \frac{2}{\lambda^2} - \frac{1}{\lambda^2} = \frac{1}{\lambda^2} ##
which yields the expected result.
Have I overlooked any details along the way or is this a valid way to derive the required quantities?
Thanks.