MS Perspective: OO.o vs MS Office

  • Thread starter dduardo
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Perspective
In summary, OpenOffice.org (OO.o) and MS Office are two office productivity suites with key differences. OO.o is open-source and uses the OpenDocument file format, while MS Office is proprietary and has its own file formats. MS Office is more widely used, but OO.o has gained popularity as a free alternative. Compatibility issues may arise between the two suites, but both offer options for conversion. MS Office has more features, but OO.o is customizable and sufficient for many users. The better suite depends on individual needs and preferences.
  • #1
dduardo
Staff Emeritus
1,905
3
http://members.microsoft.com/partner/salesmarketing/opensource/discguides/OpenOffice.pdf

Very funny stuff.

I think Micosoft is getting a bit worried about Open Source.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
It should be. Even my wife started to use OO... :smile:
 
  • #3
It's clear from this document that they are trying to downplay the capabilities of OpenOffice and emphasize the superiority of MS Office. However, as someone who has used both programs extensively, I have to say that the differences between the two are not as significant as Microsoft would like us to believe.

Yes, MS Office may have some advanced features that OpenOffice does not have, but for the average user, OpenOffice is more than capable of handling their basic word processing, spreadsheet, and presentation needs. And let's not forget that OpenOffice is completely free, while MS Office comes with a hefty price tag.

Additionally, the argument that OpenOffice lacks compatibility with MS Office documents is becoming less and less valid. With the ability to save and open documents in various file formats, including .docx and .xlsx, OpenOffice is becoming increasingly compatible with MS Office.

In the end, it really comes down to personal preference and needs. MS Office may have some advantages for certain users, but for the majority of users, OpenOffice is a viable and cost-effective alternative. And with the rise of open source software, it's clear that the market is shifting towards more affordable and accessible options like OpenOffice. So, MS may want to reconsider their dismissive attitude towards OpenOffice and start embracing the changing landscape of technology.
 

Related to MS Perspective: OO.o vs MS Office

1. What are the main differences between OO.o and MS Office?

OpenOffice.org (OO.o) and MS Office are both office productivity suites, but there are several key differences between them. One of the main differences is that OO.o is an open-source software, meaning it is free to use and can be modified by anyone. On the other hand, MS Office is a proprietary software that requires a paid license to use. Additionally, OO.o uses the OpenDocument file format while MS Office uses its own file formats, such as .docx and .xlsx. Finally, the user interfaces of the two suites are quite different, with MS Office having a more modern and polished look.

2. Which suite is more widely used?

MS Office is currently the more widely used office productivity suite, particularly in professional settings. This is due to its long-standing presence in the market and its integration with other Microsoft products, such as Windows and Outlook. However, OO.o has gained popularity in recent years, especially among individuals and organizations looking for a free alternative to MS Office.

3. Are there any compatibility issues between the two suites?

There may be some compatibility issues between the two suites, particularly when it comes to file formats. For example, MS Office may have trouble opening or formatting documents created in OO.o, and vice versa. However, both suites have made efforts to improve compatibility and offer options for converting between file formats. Additionally, there are third-party tools available that can help with compatibility issues.

4. Which suite has more features and capabilities?

In terms of sheer number of features and capabilities, MS Office likely has the edge over OO.o. This is due to its longer history and larger development team. However, OO.o offers a comprehensive set of tools for creating documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and more, and many users find it to be more than sufficient for their needs. Additionally, as an open-source software, OO.o allows for customization and the addition of new features by knowledgeable users.

5. Is one suite better than the other overall?

The answer to this question ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. For those who are used to MS Office and require advanced features or compatibility with other Microsoft products, MS Office may be the better choice. However, for those looking for a free and open-source alternative, or who simply need basic office productivity tools, OO.o can be a great option. It's best to try out both suites and see which one meets your specific needs and workflow.

Similar threads

Excel and Open Office Calc Freeze Upon Opening
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
20
Views
770
How can I create animated videos with limited artistic skills?
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is mixing Google Docs and MS Office causing formatting issues?
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
7
Views
3K
Tablet PC: Buying Advice for Droid Razr HD & MS Office Users
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
4
Views
4K
Find the Best Visio Successor: Improve Quality of PF Posts with Drawings
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
6
Views
2K
I'm considering switching to Linux but I'm not versed in ICS
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
18
Views
1K
Issue with perspective projection?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
2K
Classical Source recommendation on Differential Geometry
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
6
Views
1K
Microsoft Office 2003 vs. Microsoft Office 2007/2010
    • Computing and Technology
Replies
8
Views
12K
Does the Idea of the Metaverse Appeal To You?
    • General Discussion
Replies
22
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top