Physics Vs Engineering for different careers?

In summary, the university the person is moving to is considered one of the top 5 investment banking 'target' unis. The person plans on graduating with a masters degree in either engineering or physics, no matter what path is taken. Other than that, the person thinks that if finance doesn't work out, engineering can be a viable alternative, and that the uni ranking doesn't matter as much as the person having a respectable degree.
  • #1
OrangeMelon
5
0
I've studied at an engineering course (1st year) for the last year at a decent UK university but due to some family matters, I'm having to move to another university closer to home( and starting from 1st year again). This is one of the London unis which is very highly ranked for electrical engineering and although not so highly ranked, apparently very respectable for physics too.

Having spent the last year studying engineering, I am certain that I would much rather do a course in physics and the university offers a theoretical physics course which sounds just like what I'd like to do. I plan on graduating with a masters degree no matter whether I do the physics or engineering course. Ideally, I'd like to work in finance, specifically front office investment banking. The uni I will be attending is considered on of the top 5 investment banking 'target' unis. So with regards to extra curricular for finance interest etc, I should be ok.

I've heard from forums, friends and relatives, that for the jobs I'm interested in (and most other fields too assuming finance doesn't work out) engineering is much more employable and sort after. My question is, do you think I'd be closing a lot of door with regards to employment prospects by taking the physics course instead of the engineering one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
OrangeMelon said:
I've studied at an engineering course (1st year) for the last year at a decent UK university but due to some family matters, I'm having to move to another university closer to home( and starting from 1st year again). This is one of the London unis which is very highly ranked for electrical engineering and although not so highly ranked, apparently very respectable for physics too.

Having spent the last year studying engineering, I am certain that I would much rather do a course in physics and the university offers a theoretical physics course which sounds just like what I'd like to do. I plan on graduating with a masters degree no matter whether I do the physics or engineering course. Ideally, I'd like to work in finance, specifically front office investment banking. The uni I will be attending is considered on of the top 5 investment banking 'target' unis. So with regards to extra curricular for finance interest etc, I should be ok.

I've heard from forums, friends and relatives, that for the jobs I'm interested in (and most other fields too assuming finance doesn't work out) engineering is much more employable and sort after. My question is, do you think I'd be closing a lot of door with regards to employment prospects by taking the physics course instead of the engineering one?

Engineering is always going to be more employable than the sciences. Especially without advanced degrees. That said, if you want to work in finance, then physics might not be such a bad choice.
 
  • #3
Student100 said:
Engineering is always going to be more employable than the sciences. Especially without advanced degrees. That said, if you want to work in finance, then physics might not be such a bad choice.
Thanks for the reply. Do you have any reason for saying that physics wouldn't be a bad choice for working in finance, or any experience in fields similar to the ones I suggested working in? (Sales and trading hopefully). I've heard that maths or physics are more preferable than engineering assuming you wanted to work as a quant or perhaps an actuarist, but what about as a trader?

Other than that, assuming that finance doesn't work out (seeing as how tough it is to get into these days I think it's wise to have a back up plan), is it possible to work in engineering or software/ other non-research roles with a physics background?

Finally, going back to finance, assuming the uni I'm talking about is a 'target uni', do you think that the fact it's ranked much higher for EE than physics would make someone coming out with the physics degree much less desirable, or does the actual course ranking not matter so much given that you've been to the right uni and have a respectable degree?

(Sorry for the long response and so many questions!)
 

1. What is the main difference between physics and engineering?

Physics is the study of fundamental principles and laws that govern the natural world, while engineering is the application of these principles to design and build solutions to real-world problems.

2. Which field offers more career opportunities?

This depends on individual interests and skills. Physics careers may include research and teaching positions in academia or industry, while engineering careers offer a wide range of options such as product development, project management, and consulting.

3. Are the job duties different in physics and engineering careers?

Yes, the job duties can vary significantly between these fields. Physicists typically conduct experiments, collect and analyze data, and develop theories to explain natural phenomena. Engineers, on the other hand, use scientific principles to design, build, and test products or systems to meet specific needs.

4. Is a degree in physics or engineering more valuable?

Both degrees can be valuable, depending on the career path chosen. A physics degree can provide a strong foundation in scientific principles and analytical skills, while an engineering degree offers a more practical and hands-on approach to problem-solving. Ultimately, it is important to choose a degree that aligns with your interests and career goals.

5. Can someone with a physics degree work as an engineer and vice versa?

While it is possible for someone with a physics degree to work as an engineer and vice versa, it may require additional training or experience to transition between these fields. However, having a strong understanding of both scientific principles and practical applications can be beneficial in certain roles that require a combination of skills from both fields.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
434
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
356
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
871
Replies
3
Views
852
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
691
Replies
3
Views
906
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
749
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
1K
Back
Top