Problem (with solution) about Heisenberg's microscope

Your name] In summary, the conversation was about understanding the problem and solution included as ProblemSolution.jpg. It discussed the equations used in the problem, including Δx ≈ λ/(sinθ), Δp_x ≈ 2h(v/c)(sinθ) = 2(h/λ)(sinθ), and Δx Δp = ħ/2. The conversation also addressed questions about the geometry of the problem, the relationship between uncertainty in position and momentum, and the behavior of electrons and photons in horizontal motion. The (1.5.3) notation was clarified as a general statement about the uncertainty principle. The expert provided a summary of the concepts and equations discussed in the conversation and offered to answer any further questions
  • #1
s3a
818
8

Homework Statement


The problem along with its solution are included as ProblemSolution.jpg.

Homework Equations


(Eq. 1) Δx ≈ λ/(sinθ)
(Eq. 2) Δp_x ≈ 2h(v/c)(sinθ) = 2(h/λ)(sinθ)
(Eq. 3) Δx Δp = ħ/2

The Attempt at a Solution


I am confused about several things. Firstly, geometrically, what is Δx and λ? I ask because I am trying to make mathematical sense of the Δx ≈ λ/(sinθ) equation rather than just memorizing it. I am not looking for any rigorous proof or anything unnecessarily challenging but just an intuitive derivation.

Secondly, why does introducing the Δp_x ≈ 2h(v/c)(sinθ) = 2(h/λ)(sinθ) equation help in answering the question; that is, how does this equation “show that if we minimize Δx by reducing λ, this will result in a loss of information about the x-component of the electron momentum?”

Also, if the electrons and photons are in 100% horizontal (x-axis) motion, then why don't they simply slow down in the same direction or move in the opposite direction (still on the x-axis)? (The diagram implies that photons will move along the arrow-lines that point toward the lens.)

I also don't understand (1.5.3). Is (1.5.3) supposed be something like (Eq. 3) from above?

I would really like to understand this problem inside-out so any help in figuring this problem out will be greatly appreciated!

If more information is needed, just ask.

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • ProblemSolution.jpg
    ProblemSolution.jpg
    43.1 KB · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Thank you for your questions. Let me try to address them one by one.

1. Δx and λ are both measures of distance. Δx represents the uncertainty in the position of the electron, while λ represents the wavelength of the photon. In the context of this problem, Δx is related to the diffraction pattern of the electron as it passes through the slit, while λ is related to the wavelength of the light used to illuminate the slit. The equation Δx ≈ λ/(sinθ) is derived from the geometry of the diffraction pattern and the relationship between the slit width and the distance between the slits.

2. The equation Δp_x ≈ 2h(v/c)(sinθ) = 2(h/λ)(sinθ) is important because it relates the uncertainty in the x-component of the electron's momentum (Δp_x) to the uncertainty in the position of the electron (Δx). This equation is derived from the uncertainty principle, which states that the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum must be greater than or equal to a certain value (ħ/2). Therefore, by minimizing Δx (i.e. reducing λ), we are increasing Δp_x, which means we have less information about the x-component of the electron's momentum.

3. When the electrons and photons are in 100% horizontal motion, they are still subject to the laws of diffraction and interference. This means that, even though they are moving in the same direction, they can still interfere with each other and produce a diffraction pattern. The arrow-lines in the diagram represent the paths of the photons after they have passed through the slit and have been diffracted.

4. (1.5.3) is not meant to represent a specific equation, but rather a general statement about the relationship between the uncertainty in position (Δx) and the uncertainty in momentum (Δp). This relationship is described by the uncertainty principle, which is given by (Eq. 3) in your Homework Equations.

I hope this helps to clarify the problem for you. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
 

1. What is Heisenberg's microscope problem?

Heisenberg's microscope problem is a thought experiment proposed by physicist Werner Heisenberg to illustrate the limitations of precise measurement at the quantum level. It suggests that the very act of measuring a particle's position and momentum simultaneously will inevitably introduce uncertainty and alter the particle's state.

2. How does Heisenberg's microscope problem relate to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that it is impossible to know the exact position and momentum of a particle at the same time. Heisenberg's microscope problem demonstrates this principle by showing that the act of measuring one quantity will inevitably affect the accuracy of the other.

3. Is there a solution to Heisenberg's microscope problem?

There is no definitive solution to the problem, as it is a theoretical concept rather than a real experiment. However, one possible solution is the use of quantum entanglement, where two particles become connected and share a state, allowing for simultaneous measurements without altering the particles' states.

4. What are the implications of Heisenberg's microscope problem in quantum mechanics?

Heisenberg's microscope problem highlights the inherent uncertainty and unpredictability of quantum mechanics. It also challenges our traditional understanding of cause and effect, as the act of measuring a particle can change its state, making it difficult to determine the true cause of a particle's behavior.

5. Can Heisenberg's microscope problem be tested in a real experiment?

While the problem itself is a theoretical concept, its implications have been tested and confirmed in various quantum experiments. For example, the double-slit experiment demonstrates the wave-particle duality of particles and the uncertainty principle. However, it is not possible to recreate Heisenberg's microscope problem exactly in a real experiment.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
884
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
793
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
968
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top