Radii of stacked circles inside the graph of y = |x|^1.5

In summary, the conversation involves a discussion about finding the limit of a particular expression involving geometric arguments. The question is to use a geometrical argument to solve the problem, and the conversation explores different approaches to this problem. One method involves using rationalization, while another involves proving a separate limit and then using it to solve the original problem. Ultimately, the conversation leads to the conclusion that the limit is equal to 3, but there is some uncertainty about this result due to the inclusion of small values of r.
  • #1
songoku
2,294
325
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Not sure
1684204234937.png

1684204371854.png
(a) The hint from question is to used geometrical argument. From the graph, I can see ##r_1+r_2=c_2-c_1## but I doubt it will be usefule since the limit is ##\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1##, not in term of ##c##.

I also tried to calculate the limit directly (not using geometrical argument at all).

$$\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1} \left(\frac{r_1+r_2}{{r_2}^{1.5}-{r_1}^{1.5}}\right)$$
$$=\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1} \left(\frac{1+\frac{r_2}{r_1}}{\frac{{r_2}^{1.5}}{r_1}-{r_1}^{0.5}}\right)$$

Then got stuck

I also tried rationalization:
$$\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1} \left(\frac{r_1+r_2}{{r_2}^{1.5}-{r_1}^{1.5}}\right) \times \frac{{r_2}^{1.5}+{r_1}^{1.5}}{{r_2}^{1.5}+{r_1}^{1.5}}$$
$$=\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1} \left(\frac{(r_1+r_2)({r_2}^{1.5}+{r_1}^{1.5})}{{r_2}^{3}-{r_1}^{3}}\right)$$
$$=\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1} \left(\frac{(r_1+r_2)({r_2}^{1.5}+{r_1}^{1.5})}{(r_2-r_1)({r_2}^{2}+r_1 r_2+{r_1}^{2}})\right)$$

Then stuck again

Please give me hint, especially how to use geometrical argument.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
##r_2/r_1 \rightarrow 1## is realized when ##r_1,r_2 \rightarrow +\infty## where the curve is almost vertical and the center-center distance on y axis is
[tex]r_1+r_2 \approx r_2^{1.5}-r_1^{1.5}[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #3
anuttarasammyak said:
##r_2/r_1 \rightarrow 1## is realized when ##r_1,r_2 \rightarrow +\infty## where the curve is almost vertical and the center-center distance on y axis is
[tex]r_1+r_2 \approx r_2^{1.5}-r_1^{1.5}[/tex]
I understand.

For (b), I again tried rationalization but stuck. Do we also use geometrical argument to solve (b)?

Thanks
 
  • #4
It seems to work that
[tex]r_2^{1.5}-r_1^{1.5}=\sqrt{r_2}^3-\sqrt{r_1}^3=(\sqrt{r_2}-\sqrt{r_1})(r_2+r_1+\sqrt{r_2r_1})[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #5
Hint:

Show that ##\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty}\dfrac{r_{n+1}}{r_n}}=1## in case ##(c)## is true so that we can use the formula in ##(c)## instead.

Then show ##(c) \Longrightarrow (b) \Longrightarrow (a)## so we only have to prove ##(c)##.

Do you know any methods to prove ##(c)##?

Edit: I get ##3## as the limit in ##(a)##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #6
fresh_42 said:
Edit: I get ##3## as the limit in ##(a)##.
But using method in post#2, the answer is 1

fresh_42 said:
Hint:

Show that ##\displaystyle{\lim_{n \to \infty}\dfrac{r_{n+1}}{r_n}}=1## in case ##(c)## is true so that we can use the formula in ##(c)## instead.

Then show ##(c) \Longrightarrow (b) \Longrightarrow (a)## so we only have to prove ##(c)##.

Do you know any methods to prove ##(c)##?
Actually, I tried to prove (c) by using (b):

##\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1}## is the same as saying ##r_2## and ##r_1## are large so for large value of ##r##, ##\sqrt{r_2}-\sqrt{r_1}\approx \frac{2}{3}##

Then I changed it into:
$$\sqrt{r_{n+1}}-\sqrt{r_n}\approx \frac{2}{3}$$
$$r_{n+1}\approx \left(\frac{2}{3}+\sqrt{r_n}\right)^2$$
$$r_{n}\approx \left(\frac{2}{3}+\sqrt{r_{n-1}}\right)^2$$

Then I don't know what to do to get (c)
 
  • #7
songoku said:
But using method in post#2, the answer is 1
This isn't a method. It's a heuristic at best. I get with the use of ##(c)## and for the sake of less typing with ##x=r_n## and ##y=r_{n+1}##
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{y+x}{y\sqrt{y}-x\sqrt{x}}&=\dfrac{y+x}{(y+x)(\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{x})-x\sqrt{y}+y\sqrt{x}}\\[6pt]
&=\dfrac{1}{(\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{x})- \dfrac{x}{y+x}\sqrt{y}+\dfrac{y}{y+x}\sqrt{x}}\\[6pt]
&\stackrel{(y/x)\to 1}{\longrightarrow }\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{x}-(1/2)\sqrt{y}+(1/2)\sqrt{x}}\\[6pt]
&\stackrel{(y/x)\to 1}{\longrightarrow }2\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{x}}\stackrel{(y/x)\to 1}{\longrightarrow }3
\end{align*}
Not sure whether I made a mistake.

songoku said:
Actually, I tried to prove (c) by using (b):

##\lim_{\frac{r_2}{r_1} \rightarrow 1}## is the same as saying ##r_2## and ##r_1## are large so for large value of ##r##, ##\sqrt{r_2}-\sqrt{r_1}\approx \frac{2}{3}##

Then I changed it into:
$$\sqrt{r_{n+1}}-\sqrt{r_n}\approx \frac{2}{3}$$
$$r_{n+1}\approx \left(\frac{2}{3}+\sqrt{r_n}\right)^2$$
$$r_{n}\approx \left(\frac{2}{3}+\sqrt{r_{n-1}}\right)^2$$

Then I don't know what to do to get (c)
That doesn't work that way.

##(b)## is also easy with ##(c)##:
\begin{align*}
\lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\sqrt{r_{n+1}}-\sqrt{r_n}\right)&=\lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\dfrac{2}{3}(n-1)+\dfrac{2}{3}+\sqrt{r_1}-\dfrac{2}{3}(n-1)-\sqrt{r_1}\right)=\dfrac{2}{3}
\end{align*}
So it remains to show that ##\lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\sqrt{r_{n+1}}-\sqrt{r_n}\right)=\lim_{(r_2/r_1) \to 1}\left(\sqrt{r_{2}}-\sqrt{r_1}\right).## As I understand the limit on the right, they are the same. But maybe that is my mistake. What does ##r_2/r_1 \longrightarrow 1## mean? ##r_2## is a function of ##r_1## isn't it, so they are not independent.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #8
fresh_42 said:
This isn't a method. It's a heuristic at best. I get with the use of (c) and for the sake of less typing with x=rn and y=rn+1
y+xyy−xx=y+x(y+x)(y−x)−xy+yx=1(y−x)−xy+xy+yy+xx⟶(y/x)→11y−x−(1/2)y+(1/2)x⟶(y/x)→121y−x⟶(y/x)→13
Not sure whether I made a mistake.
I tried it a different way referring my post #4
[tex]\frac{y+x}{y^{1.5}-x^{1.5}}=(\sqrt{y/x}-1)^{-1}\sqrt{x}^{-1}(1+\frac{\sqrt{y/x}}{1+y/x})^{-1}[/tex]
In the limit RHS first coefficient goes to infinity, the second goes to zero because geometry requires x ##\rightarrow \infty## to pursuit the limit, and the third goes to 2/3.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and fresh_42
  • #9
From geometry I observe
Relation of t >0 and r, evaluating line equation and length of r,
[tex]t=-\frac{2}{9}+\sqrt{\frac{4}{81}+r^2}[/tex]
Recurrence formula with t from ##c_2-c_1=r_1+r_2##
[tex]c_2-r_2=c_1+r_1[/tex]thus
[tex]3t_{n+1}^{3/2}-\sqrt{13}t_{n+1}+6t_{n+1}^{1/2}=3t_{n}^{3/2}+\sqrt{13}t_{n}+6t_{n}^{1/2}[/tex]
if I do not make mistakes.
1684327783625.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #10
anuttarasammyak said:
I tried it a different way referring my post #4
[tex]\frac{y+x}{y^{1.5}-x^{1.5}}=(\sqrt{y/x}-1)^{-1}\sqrt{x}^{-1}(1+\frac{\sqrt{y/x}}{1+y/x})^{-1}[/tex]
In the limit RHS first coefficient goes to infinity, the second goes to zero because geometry requires x ##\rightarrow \infty## to pursuit the limit, and the third goes to 2/3.
I think the problem is not in post#4 but post#2 because @fresh_42 got 3 (which is also different from question). I follow his working and it also makes sense.

fresh_42 said:
That doesn't work that way.

##(b)## is also easy with ##(c)##:
\begin{align*}
\lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\sqrt{r_{n+1}}-\sqrt{r_n}\right)&=\lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\dfrac{2}{3}(n-1)+\dfrac{2}{3}+\sqrt{r_1}-\dfrac{2}{3}(n-1)-\sqrt{r_1}\right)=\dfrac{2}{3}
\end{align*}
So it remains to show that ##\lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\sqrt{r_{n+1}}-\sqrt{r_n}\right)=\lim_{(r_2/r_1) \to 1}\left(\sqrt{r_{2}}-\sqrt{r_1}\right).## As I understand the limit on the right, they are the same. But maybe that is my mistake. What does ##r_2/r_1 \longrightarrow 1## mean? ##r_2## is a function of ##r_1## isn't it, so they are not independent.
I got (c) but not sure whether my method is valid. I used something like telescoping

$$\sqrt{r_n}-\sqrt{r_{n-1}}=\frac{2}{3}$$
$$\sqrt{r_{n-1}}-\sqrt{r_{n-2}}=\frac{2}{3}$$
$$\sqrt{r_{n-2}}-\sqrt{r_{n-3}}=\frac{2}{3}$$
$$.$$
$$\sqrt{r_2}-\sqrt{r_1}=\frac{2}{3}$$

Adding all the above:
$$\sqrt{r_n}-\sqrt{r_1}=\frac{2}{3}(n-1)$$
$$r_n=\left(\frac{2}{3}(n-1)+\sqrt{r_1} \right)^2$$

But the question states "for large r" while I also included small r so I am not sure
 
  • #11
songoku said:
I think the problem is not in post#4 but post#2 because @fresh_42 got 3 (which is also different from question). I follow his working and it also makes sense.
The fraction, thanks to post #7
1684457893933.png
[tex]=\sqrt{x}^{-1} \frac{1+a}{a\sqrt{a}-1}[/tex]
[tex]=\sqrt{x}^{-1} \frac{1+a}{(\sqrt{a}-1)(a+\sqrt{a}+1)}[/tex] or
[tex]=(\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{x})^{-1} \frac{1+a}{a+\sqrt{a}+1}[/tex]
where
[tex]a=\frac{y}{x}[/tex]
Say the fraction has limit c for a ##\rightarrow## 1
[tex]\sqrt{y}-\sqrt{x}\ \ \rightarrow \ \frac{2}{3c}[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes songoku

1. What is the significance of the graph y = |x|^1.5?

The graph y = |x|^1.5 is a type of power function, also known as a square root function. It is commonly used to model relationships between two variables in various scientific fields, such as physics and biology.

2. How are the radii of stacked circles related to the graph y = |x|^1.5?

The radii of the stacked circles represent the values of the function y = |x|^1.5 at different points on the x-axis. As the x-value increases, the corresponding radius of the circle also increases, resulting in a larger circle on the graph.

3. What do the stacked circles inside the graph represent?

The stacked circles inside the graph represent the data points or values of the function y = |x|^1.5. Each circle represents a specific x-value and its corresponding y-value, creating a visual representation of the function's behavior.

4. How can the graph of y = |x|^1.5 be used in scientific research?

The graph of y = |x|^1.5 can be used to analyze and interpret data in various scientific research projects. It can help researchers identify patterns and trends in their data, and make predictions about future outcomes based on the function's behavior.

5. What is the relationship between the radii of the stacked circles and the slope of the graph y = |x|^1.5?

The slope of the graph y = |x|^1.5 is directly related to the radii of the stacked circles. As the slope of the graph increases, the radii of the circles also increase, indicating a steeper increase in the function's values. Conversely, a smaller slope results in smaller radii and a less steep increase in the function's values.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
947
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
622
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
696
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
802
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
988
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
Back
Top