Self-Studying: Theoretical Calculus vs Analysis

In summary, the conversation is about a student seeking advice on which mathematics books to study in order to improve their understanding of single-variable calculus and proofs. They are considering starting with either "advanced" calculus books or introductory analysis books and are seeking recommendations. The student also mentions their future plans to attend a graduate program in applied math or pure math.
  • #1
bacte2013
398
47
Dear Physics Forum advisers,

I am a sophomore in US with double majors in mathematics and microbiology; my current computational/mathematical biology research got my interested in the mathematics, particularly the Analysis and Algebra, and led me to start with calculus II (computational aspect) and discrete mathematics. My coursework plan is to take multi-variable calculus on summer and introductory analysis & theoretical linear algebra & mathematical statistics on Fall 2015. My calculus II course uses the specialized course packet and I have been using "Calculus with Analytic Geometry" by George Simmons to supplement it. However, I want to learn more about the single-variable calculus and proofs behind it because I am really interested in them and computational aspect does not satisfy me. Since I do not have heavy course load on this semester, I have a lot of time to devote on self-studying the mathematics.

My plan is to either start with "advanced" calculus books like Apostol vol.I, Courant vol.I, Peter Lax, and Spivak OR introductory analysis books like Rudin (PMA), Zorich, Apostol (mathematical analysis), Strichartz, Abott, Ross, and Pugh. I am fairly good with proof methodology which I learned from my current discrete mathematics course and "How to Prove It" by Velleman. Should I jump right into those analysis books or should I start with those advanced calculus books? I already finished with Simmons book and course packet except for the series & sequence chapters.

My future plan is to attend a mathematics graduate program in either applied math (specifically the biological science) or pure math (specifically algebra or analysis).

Thank you very much for your time, and I look forward to your advice and input!
PK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There are better books than the ones you listed. Some of my recommendations:

Analysis by its history: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387945512/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This is a truly unique and excellent book. It approaches analysis from a historic perspective and makes you understand why we do the things we do. It contains some really beautiful things. I still skim through it now and then because it's truly wonderful.

Bloch: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387721762/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This books proves everything. And I really do mean everything. It starts from natural numbers and goes all the way to rigorous analysis. Not even things like decimal representation is accepted without proof.

That said, you might find your proof abilities are lacking. Just doing Velleman really isn't enough. But if you persist, you'll get the proofs down very quickly!
 
  • #3
Jump right into analysis if that's what you're interested in. You don't really need to know advanced calculus topics in order to understand single-variable analysis. The best subject to self-study is the subject you're the most interested in. I don't know too much about different analysis books, but Rudin may be a bit tough. Rudin will be great later when you want to revisit the material.
 

1. What is the difference between theoretical calculus and analysis?

Theoretical calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of rates of change and accumulation, while analysis is a branch of mathematics that focuses on the rigorous study of limits, continuity, derivatives, and integrals. In other words, theoretical calculus is concerned with the application of calculus principles to solve problems, while analysis is more concerned with the underlying theory and foundations of calculus.

2. Which should I choose to self-study, theoretical calculus or analysis?

This ultimately depends on your interests and goals. If you are more interested in practical applications and problem-solving, then theoretical calculus may be the better choice. However, if you are more interested in the underlying theory and mathematical rigor, then analysis may be the better option.

3. Is it necessary to have a strong background in mathematics before attempting to self-study theoretical calculus or analysis?

Yes, it is recommended to have a solid foundation in basic algebra, trigonometry, and precalculus before attempting to self-study theoretical calculus or analysis. These subjects are fundamental to understanding the concepts and principles of calculus.

4. What are some good resources for self-studying theoretical calculus or analysis?

There are many online resources and textbooks available for self-studying theoretical calculus or analysis. Some popular options include Khan Academy, MIT OpenCourseWare, and textbooks by authors such as James Stewart and Michael Spivak. It is important to find a resource that suits your learning style and provides clear explanations and examples.

5. How much time should I dedicate to self-studying theoretical calculus or analysis?

This will vary depending on your individual learning pace and goals. However, it is recommended to set aside at least 1-2 hours per day for self-studying, and to consistently review and practice the material to ensure understanding. It is also important to take breaks and not overload yourself with too much material at once.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
16
Views
421
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
185
Replies
11
Views
489
Replies
7
Views
869
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
810
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
671
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
943
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top