Statics Problem 4/49: Method of Sections

In summary, the homework statement is to determine the force in member BE of the loaded truss. The attempt at a solution is to find the sum of the moments about A to get: -12L - 56L +40Dy = 0. The calculation assumes the truss is cut through at point Q and the vertical forces are summed. Dy = 1.65L and Ay = 1.34L when the truss is cut through Q and the vertical forces are summed. The back of the book solution is .787L.
  • #1
ErLupo
4
0

Homework Statement


Determine the force in member BE of the loaded
truss.

Capture.PNG


See the attached picture.

Homework Equations


Sum of the Moments = 0
Sum of the Forces = 0
db294be8057ef5a33ecc90a182f9bab0.png


Inline7.gif
Inline8.gif
Inline9.gif


Inline10.gif
Inline11.gif
Inline12.gif


Inline13.gif
Inline14.gif
Inline15.gif


The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Sum moments about A to get:

-12L - 56L +40Dy = 0
Dy=1.7L

Sum the forces in the y direction:

Ay + Dy - L - 2L = 0
Ay = 1.3L

Cut through BC, BE, and FE at "Q"

Then sum the forces in the y direction:

-BEsin(θ) + Ay - L = 0
BE=.3L/sin(θ)

I'm really at a loss at how to get theta. The main problem I have is determining the horizontal distance between B and F. I am unable to determine what that distance is. If I had that distance I believe I could use the Law of sines and subsequently find theta.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The key is solving triangle ABF.

Can you figure the vertical distance between points A and B? (Hint: what angle does the line AB make with the horizontal?)
 
  • #3
Wouldn't that just be;

Let x = vertical distance.

12/sin30 = y/sin60

y = 20.78.

That would make the hypotenuse = 24 (Pythagorean Theorem).

Then to solve for the hypotenuse BF of the small 15 degree triangle:

BF/sin15 = 24/sin120

BF = 7.17

Then to solve for the two legs joined at a right angle of the small 15 degree triangle:

Let BFx = horizontal distance between B and F.

BFx = 7.17*cos75°
BFx = 1.86

BFy = 7.17*sin75°
BFy = 6.93

To solve the right triangle with hypotenuse BE:

Horizontal distance between B and E
BEx = 16 - 1.86
BEx = 14.14

Now do inverse tangent to find the angle which is the same as theta:

θ = tan^-1(6.93/14.14)
θ = 26.1°

However, when I use that in my previous equation, BE=.3L/sin(θ), I come up with .682L which is off from the answer of .787L.

Any thoughts?
Thank you!
 
  • #4
ErLupo said:
Wouldn't that just be;

Let x = vertical distance.

12/sin30 = y/sin60

y = 20.78.

That would make the hypotenuse = 24 (Pythagorean Theorem).

Then to solve for the hypotenuse BF of the small 15 degree triangle:

BF/sin15 = 24/sin120

BF = 7.17

Then to solve for the two legs joined at a right angle of the small 15 degree triangle:

Let BFx = horizontal distance between B and F.

BFx = 7.17*cos75°
BFx = 1.86

BFy = 7.17*sin75°
BFy = 6.93

I agree with your calculations up to this point. Good job.

To solve the right triangle with hypotenuse BE:

Horizontal distance between B and E
BEx = 16 - 1.86
BEx = 14.14

The calculation above is where the error crept into your calculations.

Notice that the frame is symmetrical about the vertical axis.
The length BC = 16 feet.

In order to find the length FE, you must use the symmetry of the frame to find the length of FE w.r.t. the length of BC.
Your calculation assumed FE = BC - BEx, which is slightly in error, because it corrects for only one side of the frame.
 
  • #5
Yes, FE = BC - 2BEx, correct?

So that would make FE = 12.29

But if I were to use a right triangle with hypotenuse BE wouldn't I just add BEx which would be 14.14?

Even if I only use the actual length of FE (12.29) and a combination of law of sines and cosines to get the unknowns I still end up with an angle 26.1 degrees.
 
  • #6
ErLupo said:
Yes, FE = BC - 2BEx, correct?

So that would make FE = 12.29

But if I were to use a right triangle with hypotenuse BE wouldn't I just add BEx which would be 14.14?

Just as point F is not located directly under point B along a vertical line, neither is point E located directly beneath point C. :wink:

Even if I only use the actual length of FE (12.29) and a combination of law of sines and cosines to get the unknowns I still end up with an angle 26.1 degrees.

BC = 16 ft.
FE' = 16 - 1.86 = 14.14 ft. (horizontal distance between B and E)

BF = 7.17 ft.

BF cos 15° = 6.93' (vertical distance between B and F)

∠FBE + 15° + θ = 90°

∠FBE = tan-1(14.14 / 6.93) - 15° = 48.9°

θ = 26.1°

I agree with your calculation of θ. :smile:

Looking back into your original calculations,

Sum moments about A to get:

-12L - 56L +40Dy = 0

Notice that the moment arms for the loads L and 2L don't quite line up with the distances measured to points B and C, respectively.

L and 2L are applied at points F and E instead. :frown:
 
  • #7
Ah. Yes. This makes sense. That was my mistake.

When I use the changed distances to the moment arms I get Dy = 1.65L and Ay = 1.34L.

When the truss is cut through Q and the vertical forces are summed I got:

Ay - BEsin(θ) - L = 0

BE = (1.34L - L)/(sin(26.1°))

BE = .787L

Which matches the back of the book!

Thank you so much for the help!
 
  • #8
Glad everything worked out! :smile:
 

1. What is the Method of Sections in statics?

The Method of Sections is a technique used in statics to determine the internal forces in a structure by cutting it into smaller sections and analyzing the equilibrium of the resulting free body diagrams.

2. When should the Method of Sections be used?

The Method of Sections is best used for determining the internal forces in trusses or other structures with multiple intersecting members. It is particularly useful for analyzing complex structures with many unknown forces.

3. How do you use the Method of Sections to solve a problem?

To use the Method of Sections, you first need to identify the sections of the structure that you want to analyze. Then, you must cut through those sections and create free body diagrams for each. Finally, you can use the equations of equilibrium to solve for the unknown forces in each section.

4. What are the advantages of using the Method of Sections?

The Method of Sections allows for the analysis of complex structures with multiple intersecting members. It also simplifies the analysis by reducing the number of unknown forces that need to be solved for.

5. Are there any limitations to using the Method of Sections?

The Method of Sections is most effective for analyzing statically determinate structures, meaning structures with known external loads and reactions. It may not be as effective for analyzing statically indeterminate structures, which have additional unknown forces due to redundant members.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
865
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top