- #1
ColtonCM
- 33
- 2
So I sucked at science and math in high school, therefore my foundation in these subjects sucked. Senior year I had a biology teacher that really allowed me to discover the wonder of science and to ask deeper questions about biology, physics, the universe, etc. So I changed from my economics/history route to a biology one when I entered university.
Just recently (I'm currently 3rd year in university), I switched to a biochemistry major from biology because I preferred the problem solving of chemistry to the rote memorization of biology.
And as stupid as it sounds, every time I read science fiction or watch it on TV or in the theaters, the questions that I always like to ask are about physics. I've seen Interstellar like five times because of how fascinating I find these concepts (relativity, black holes, even what some people might consider relatively trivial, like spinning a ship to account for a lack of gravity while traveling).
So now I'm sort of regretting not doing physics right off the bat. What initially stopped me was my fear of mathematics. Like I said I had a rocky start with math. I had to withdraw from two separate calculus classes before succeeding in the calculus sequence.
Now that I've finally overcome the mental barrier to mathematics, I feel like it was all just a mentality issue. If I would have been positive and proactive about learning math earlier, I might have discovered that I had the ability to learn physics all along and I wouldn't have been so afraid of it.
So what I'm considering doing is this.
1) Finishing my biochemistry degree at University of Denver. This degree gets me a minor in biology. I will get a minor in mathematics and physics because to get these two minors only requires two more classes in each subject. I will spend a 5th year here at DU to get the astrophysics minor.
2) When I graduate DU with my bachelors in biochemistry, I will switch to CU Boulder and try to get an astronomy major (astrophysics focus for researchers/etc, so basically an astrophysics degree).
I'm just wondering if this is a stupid decision. I mean, it will set me back 3-4 years again, before I enter higher studies (masters, PhD). I know that a PhD is eventually where I want to end up, doing real research and holding a professorship somewhere.
What I was thinking was that while I get the astronomy degree, I would just work in various labs for pay or as an intern so that I build up a reservoir of experience and sources of recommendation letters (lol) so that I can actually get into a masters/PhD program that is decent and not lackluster.
Does this sound like a solid plan? Finances aren't an issue. I've managed debt so far fairly well, and I have a house that is in my name worth about $75,000-$125,000 (depending on the market) that I can sell at any time in case of an emergency, though I plan to rent it out to up to four college students at a time to cover my monthly loan payments, rather than getting a lump-sum out of it.
I guess the real question is one of... is it worth it? Is waiting an extra 3-4 years to become a scientist worth it so long as the type of scientist I do end up becoming is more rewarding than what I would otherwise become (a biochemist)? How do graduate schools and PhD programs view someone who has been in undergraduate courses that long? Negatively, or does it have the positive effect of giving me time to work in labs to show that I have lots of experience and am prepared for that next level?
Any advice here is appreciated.
Thanks,
Colton
Just recently (I'm currently 3rd year in university), I switched to a biochemistry major from biology because I preferred the problem solving of chemistry to the rote memorization of biology.
And as stupid as it sounds, every time I read science fiction or watch it on TV or in the theaters, the questions that I always like to ask are about physics. I've seen Interstellar like five times because of how fascinating I find these concepts (relativity, black holes, even what some people might consider relatively trivial, like spinning a ship to account for a lack of gravity while traveling).
So now I'm sort of regretting not doing physics right off the bat. What initially stopped me was my fear of mathematics. Like I said I had a rocky start with math. I had to withdraw from two separate calculus classes before succeeding in the calculus sequence.
Now that I've finally overcome the mental barrier to mathematics, I feel like it was all just a mentality issue. If I would have been positive and proactive about learning math earlier, I might have discovered that I had the ability to learn physics all along and I wouldn't have been so afraid of it.
So what I'm considering doing is this.
1) Finishing my biochemistry degree at University of Denver. This degree gets me a minor in biology. I will get a minor in mathematics and physics because to get these two minors only requires two more classes in each subject. I will spend a 5th year here at DU to get the astrophysics minor.
2) When I graduate DU with my bachelors in biochemistry, I will switch to CU Boulder and try to get an astronomy major (astrophysics focus for researchers/etc, so basically an astrophysics degree).
I'm just wondering if this is a stupid decision. I mean, it will set me back 3-4 years again, before I enter higher studies (masters, PhD). I know that a PhD is eventually where I want to end up, doing real research and holding a professorship somewhere.
What I was thinking was that while I get the astronomy degree, I would just work in various labs for pay or as an intern so that I build up a reservoir of experience and sources of recommendation letters (lol) so that I can actually get into a masters/PhD program that is decent and not lackluster.
Does this sound like a solid plan? Finances aren't an issue. I've managed debt so far fairly well, and I have a house that is in my name worth about $75,000-$125,000 (depending on the market) that I can sell at any time in case of an emergency, though I plan to rent it out to up to four college students at a time to cover my monthly loan payments, rather than getting a lump-sum out of it.
I guess the real question is one of... is it worth it? Is waiting an extra 3-4 years to become a scientist worth it so long as the type of scientist I do end up becoming is more rewarding than what I would otherwise become (a biochemist)? How do graduate schools and PhD programs view someone who has been in undergraduate courses that long? Negatively, or does it have the positive effect of giving me time to work in labs to show that I have lots of experience and am prepared for that next level?
Any advice here is appreciated.
Thanks,
Colton