Volume of solids of revolutions. (Integral problem)

In summary, The function is given at y = \sqrt{x-x^2}, and find the volume of the solid of the revolution around the x axis. Not sure if this is the correct translation, but find the volume when you revolve the function around the x axis. The sphere in question has to have a radius that is sqrt{x-x^2}.
  • #1
Mutaja
239
0

Homework Statement


A function is given at y = [itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex]

Find the volume of the solid of the revolution around the x axis. Not sure if this is the correct translation, but find the volume when you revolve the function around the x axis.

The object in question is a sphere. What does the radius of the sphere has to be?

The Attempt at a Solution



I am slightly familiar with the disc method in this case, but I am not familiar with the notes I've written from my lectures. This is what I've done so far.

The function goes from 0-1, and when revolved it forms a sphere.

Radius: [itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex]
Area: ∏*##r^2## = ∏([itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex])

Vd = ∏ [itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex] dx

Vt = ∫∏[itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex] dx (upper limit 1, lower limit 0).

To find the volume o this sphere, I have to solve this integration problem:

∫∏[itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex] dx (upper limit 1, lower limit 0)

Here's where I get a problem. I attempt to use the substitution method, and I get this equation:

u = x-##x^2##
∫[itex]\sqrt{u}[/itex] dx
∫##u^(1/2)## dx

This equals [itex]\frac{u^(3/2)}{\frac{3}{2}}[/itex]

And I substitute u for x and end up with the final equation:

[itex]\frac{(x-x^2)^(3/2)}{\frac{3}{2}}[/itex]

When I set in limits for this equation and solve the problem, I get 0 - this is obviously wrong.

I'm fairly sure that I've integrated the problem wrong, but have I even attempted to integrate the correct expression?

Any help as always highly appreciated.

Edit: I have trouble with the formatting when I want to raise expressions to a higher power when I use latex.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Mutaja said:

Homework Statement


A function is given at y = [itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex]

Find the volume of the solid of the revolution around the x axis. Not sure if this is the correct translation, but find the volume when you revolve the function around the x axis.

The object in question is a sphere. What does the radius of the sphere has to be?

Complete the square and put it in standard form to see.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am slightly familiar with the disc method in this case, but I am not familiar with the notes I've written from my lectures. This is what I've done so far.

The function goes from 0-1, and when revolved it forms a sphere.

Radius: [itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex]
Area: ∏*##r^2## = ∏([itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex])

Vd = ∏ [itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex] dx

Vt = ∫∏[itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex] dx (upper limit 1, lower limit 0).

You forgot to square the radius.

Edit: I have trouble with the formatting when I want to raise expressions to a higher power when I use latex.

Put the exponent in braces {}.
 
  • #3
LCKurtz said:
Complete the square and put it in standard form to see.



You forgot to square the radius.



Put the exponent in braces {}.

Ah, ok, thanks. Will this be correct?

r = ([itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex])##^2## = x-##x^2##

Vd = ∏ (x-##x^2##) dx

Vt = ∫∏ (x-##x^2##) dx

Vt = [∏ ([itex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/itex] - [itex]\frac{x^3}{3}[/itex] ] (upper limit 1, lower limit 0)

Vt = ∏ ([itex]\frac{1^2}{2}[/itex] - [itex]\frac{1^3}{3}[/itex])

= [itex]\frac{∏}{6}[/itex]

Total volume of the sphere is [itex]\frac{∏}{6}[/itex].

The radius of the sphere is x-##x^2##.

The radius doesn't make sense to me, otherwise what I've done looks ok to me.

Thanks a lot for your help, I really appreciate it.
 
  • #4
Mutaja said:
Ah, ok, thanks. Will this be correct?

r = ([itex]\sqrt{x-x^2}[/itex])##^2## = x-##x^2##

Vd = ∏ (x-##x^2##) dx

Vt = ∫∏ (x-##x^2##) dx

Vt = [∏ ([itex]\frac{x^2}{2}[/itex] - [itex]\frac{x^3}{3}[/itex] ] (upper limit 1, lower limit 0)

Vt = ∏ ([itex]\frac{1^2}{2}[/itex] - [itex]\frac{1^3}{3}[/itex])

= [itex]\frac{∏}{6}[/itex]

Total volume of the sphere is [itex]\frac{∏}{6}[/itex].

The radius of the sphere is x-##x^2##.

The radius doesn't make sense to me, otherwise what I've done looks ok to me.

Thanks a lot for your help, I really appreciate it.

You have an equation ##y = \sqrt{x-x^2}##. Square both sides and put it in the standard form for the equation of a sphere. That will give you its center and radius. The standard form for a sphere is$$
(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2$$Once you know the radius, you can check your answer for the volume using ##V = \frac 4 3 \pi r^3## and your radius.
 
  • #5
LCKurtz said:
You have an equation ##y = \sqrt{x-x^2}##. Square both sides and put it in the standard form for the equation of a sphere. That will give you its center and radius. The standard form for a sphere is$$
(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2$$Once you know the radius, you can check your answer for the volume using ##V = \frac 4 3 \pi r^3## and your radius.

I'm sorry, but I'm lost.

Any chance we can take a quick recap?

##y^2## = x - ##x^2##

Put that into $$
(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2$$

And I get:

r = [itex]\sqrt{x^2 +(x-x^2)}[/itex]

I'm confused as to which equations are important. Should I get y = or r =, should I insert for (x-##x^2##) for y etc...

I've been watching Khan Academy's videos on Disc method (rotating f(x) about x axis) and Volume of a sphere to try and get an understanding of the problem - and I do. The problem occur when I try to implement my own equation into his methods + try to get help from you.

I'm confusing myself, obviously, but please help me clear this up, and I'll do my best to understand it.
 
  • #6
Mutaja said:
##y^2## = x - ##x^2##

Put that into $$
(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2$$

And I get:

r = [itex]\sqrt{x^2 +(x-x^2)}[/itex]
How do you get that? What happened to x0 and y0?
You are looking for a combination of constants, r, x0 and y0, which makes ##(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2## reduce to ##y^2 = x - x^2##.
 
  • #7
haruspex said:
How do you get that? What happened to x0 and y0?
You are looking for a combination of constants, r, x0 and y0, which makes ##(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2## reduce to ##y^2 = x - x^2##.

I just assumed x0 and y0 was 0.
 
  • #8
Mutaja said:
I just assumed x0 and y0 was 0.

Then don't.
 
  • #9
haruspex said:
Then don't.

I realize that, but it doesn't go well with what my notes says, nor what Khan Academy says. I find the formula in my book, but I don't understand how to use it as it's explained bad in my opinion. I also realize that it's very likely that it's well explained, I just can't get my head around it and understand it.

The formula is sound, but what is x0 and y0, and are they related to x and y? Like the general understanding I have of this is that x0 and y0 are starting coordinates and x and y are ending coordinates. But I can't put numbers into the equation from looking at the graph, because that would give x0 and y0 = 0, x = 1, y equals 1/2.

Any chance you can elaborate or explain it somehow? I'll do my absolute best to understand this.
 
  • #10
Mutaja said:
what is x0 and y0
##x^2 + y^2 = r^2## is the equation of a sphere radius r centred at the origin. ##(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2## is also the equation of a sphere radius r. Where do you think its centre is?
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
##x^2 + y^2 = r^2## is the equation of a sphere radius r centred at the origin. ##(x-x_0)^2 + (y-y_0)^2 = r^2## is also the equation of a sphere radius r. Where do you think its centre is?

I re did the whole problem, and wrote down the equations.

I ended up with just solving the equation for volume in respect to radius so:

V= [itex]\frac{4}{3}[/itex] ∏ ##r^3##

equals: r = [itex]\sqrt[3]{\frac{3v}{4∏}}[/itex]

Putting in my above answers for volume ([itex]\frac{∏}{6}[/itex]) I get r = [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex].

That is exactly the same as what I get when I graph the function. It should be correct?

I still have no clue on how to use the x and y equation you're using. Is there any way you can explain it in a simpler way than what you've done so far?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
The curve that's being revolved around the x-axis is ##y = \sqrt{x - x^2}##. If you square both sides of this equation, you get y2 = x - x2, or x2 - x + y2 = 0.

The graph of the first equation is the upper half of a circle. The graph of the second equation is the entire circle, not a sphere as others have said in this thread. When you rotate the first graph about the x-axis, you get a sphere.

Earlier in this thread LCKurtz recommended that you complete the square in this equation -- x2 - x + y2 = 0 -- to write it in standard form for a circle. When you do that, you'll see that the center is at (1/2, 0) and the radius is 1/2.

Since you didn't follow up on LCKurtz's suggestion, is it because you don't know how to complete the square? I would guess that this is one of the topics at Khan Academy. If you don't know this technique, it would be good for you to learn it.
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
Since you didn't follow up on LCKurtz's suggestion, is it because you don't know how to complete the square?

The short answer is yes.

To elaborate a little, I haven't got any formula or equation like that in my notes. The only place I can find it is in my book, which to my understanding explains it badly (as previously stated, that's most likely because of me, not the author of the book).

But the way I have solved the problem works, does it not? I will look into LCKurtz's suggestion later for sure, but right not I'll try to do more problems like this one to get a better understanding of how to think when solving them. Or maybe it would be better to start exploring his suggestion straight away? Because my next problem is sort of the same, only around the y-axis. I will probably post another thread shortly on that topic if I can't solve it myself.

Again, your help is much appreciated. Thanks a lot.
 
  • #14
Mutaja said:
The short answer is yes.

To elaborate a little, I haven't got any formula or equation like that in my notes. The only place I can find it is in my book, which to my understanding explains it badly (as previously stated, that's most likely because of me, not the author of the book).

But the way I have solved the problem works, does it not? I will look into LCKurtz's suggestion later for sure, but right not I'll try to do more problems like this one to get a better understanding of how to think when solving them. Or maybe it would be better to start exploring his suggestion straight away? Because my next problem is sort of the same, only around the y-axis. I will probably post another thread shortly on that topic if I can't solve it myself.

Again, your help is much appreciated. Thanks a lot.
'Completing the square' is a fundamental technique for dealing with quadratics. It's how one obtains the usual formula for solving them. I would recommend filling that gap in your learning ASAP.
 
  • #15
Mutaja said:
Or maybe it would be better to start exploring his suggestion straight away?
Yes, right away.
 

1. What is the definition of "volume of solids of revolution"?

The volume of solids of revolution is the amount of space occupied by a three-dimensional object created by rotating a two-dimensional shape around an axis. It is typically calculated using integration in calculus.

2. How do you find the volume of solids of revolution using integrals?

To find the volume of a solid of revolution, you need to first determine the function that represents the cross-sectional area of the solid. Then, use the formula V = ∫ A(x) dx, where A(x) is the area function and dx represents the width of each infinitesimal slice of the solid.

3. What is the difference between finding the volume of a solid of revolution and finding the area under a curve?

The main difference is that when finding the volume of a solid of revolution, the cross-sectional area changes as the shape is rotated, whereas when finding the area under a curve, the area remains constant. Additionally, finding the volume involves integration in the z-direction, while finding the area under a curve involves integration in the x or y-direction.

4. Can the volume of solids of revolution be negative?

No, the volume of a solid of revolution cannot be negative. The volume represents the amount of space occupied by the object, and space cannot have a negative value.

5. In what real-life situations can finding the volume of solids of revolution be useful?

Finding the volume of solids of revolution is useful in many engineering and scientific fields, such as calculating the volume of pipes, tanks, and other curved structures. It is also used in physics to calculate the moment of inertia, which is important in understanding rotational motion. It can also be applied in biology and medicine to analyze the volume of organs or other biological structures.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
457
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
700
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
962
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
591
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
671
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
260
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
872
Back
Top