I Weird Depictions of Birefringence with Angle of Incidence 0°

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Birefringence involves the phenomenon of double refraction, where light splits into two rays when passing through certain materials. Even at normal incidence (0° angle), the extraordinary ray propagates at a different angle, which can seem counterintuitive. This behavior aligns with Snell's law, although one ray's direction may not conform to typical refraction principles. The discussion highlights the complexity of birefringence and the need for careful interpretation of related images and diagrams. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate analysis in optics.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
Hi.
Some results for "birefringence" in Google Image Search look odd to me:
1746044402393.jpeg
1746044417109.jpeg
1746044459215.jpeg


Aren't they wrong? Why would there be refraction if the angle of indicence is 0°?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom.G said:
@greypilgrim The relevant section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birefringence#Double_refraction
wikipedia said:
So even in the case of normal incidence, where one would compute the angle of refraction as zero (according to Snell's law, regardless of the effective index of refraction), the energy of the extraordinary ray is propagated at an angle.
See also:
https://www.physicsbootcamp.org/section-birefrengence.html
physicsbootcamp said:
Clearly, one of these directions is consistent with Snell’s law of refraction, and the other is not.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top