Na+ & OH- Dissociation: Energy Absorbed yet Heat Liberated

  • Thread starter Thread starter m0286
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dissociation of Na+ and OH- ions, which initially absorbs energy but results in an overall exothermic reaction. The key points highlight the concept of enthalpy of dissolution, where energy is required to break the lattice structure of the ions. However, the process ultimately releases heat due to the increased order from solvation, demonstrating the interplay between enthalpic and entropic factors in chemical reactions. This understanding clarifies why a reaction can absorb energy initially yet still be exothermic overall.
m0286
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Nevermind!

My heads going crazy when I think about this PLEASE HELP!

In a reaction, Na+ ions are separated from OH- ions, a process of dissociation that absorbs energy, yet, in the end, heat was liberated by the overall process... WHY? :bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Never Mind I Figured It Out Thanks For Looking Though :)
 
It may still be instructive (to yourself) and others to post whatever it is that you have figured out.
 
enthalpy of dissolution heh? It takes energy to break apart the lattice energy, yet the increased order associated with the solvation suffices for the overall reaction to be exothermic. The one has to take into account both enthalpy and entropical factors.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top