Recent content by Baal Hadad

  1. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    I tried this approach before and get a nice graph with peak at 1 actually, but my coursemates think elsewise, so I decided to ask somewhere for further clarification. Maybe I am right at the beginning... By the way, maybe a 2 variable graph is expected, by changing ##\theta## using an external...
  2. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    Thank you for your reply. Firstly, the values 17keV and 0.1eV are as in the original question. For the grammatical problem, the original question is worded as:" Write a code showing for...", with the rest followed word-by-word as in the homework statement. For the context of the word...
  3. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    Well, thanks for you reply. My lecturer asked for Python coding, so I think MATLAB cannot be used. And also, do you mean that: $$ \omega=\omega_i=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\omega_f}-\frac{h}{m_e c^2}(1-\cos{\theta})} $$ But using Desmos to plot gives me a straight horizontal line at 0. Maybe I will...
  4. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    I asked him and he asked me to search the internet myself. Never mind,maybe I will search myself, thanks.
  5. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    No, I am not self-studying. But Lorentzian profile is never on the syllabus in the module"Modern Physics", since the lectures are almost based on topics from Krane.
  6. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    Do you have any suggestions on course on Lorentzian profile? Fotr now the syllabus I studied only covered until Krane's Chapter 2 to 5 at most.
  7. B

    Relationship between spectral distribution and Compton scattering

    First of all, this is question from the modern physics module in 1st year physics program. The problem is I have no prior knowledge about spectroscopy or Lorentzian profile. However, the Compton scattering topic was already introduced. The Compton scattering formula can be changed into the...
  8. B

    Classical Opinions about these textbooks for vibrations and waves

    Thanks. Maybe that's why they aren't as popular as popular textbooks such as French or Pain.
  9. B

    Classical Opinions about these textbooks for vibrations and waves

    Thanks for your advice. I think that I will go for French.Besides,do you have any experience for the two books above(Kneubühl and Rabinovich)?
  10. B

    Classical Opinions about these textbooks for vibrations and waves

    Hi. I am going to enter uni this October as a first year physics major.One of the first courses I will take is Vibrations and Waves,and the recommended materials are as below: French,Vibrations and Waves Pain,The Physics of Vibrations and Waves, 6th Edition According to Amazon's review,there...
  11. B

    Solve the differential equation: y′′y′+yy′+yy′′=0

    Or can I integrate the inverse function,even I don't know it?
  12. B

    Solve the differential equation: y′′y′+yy′+yy′′=0

    Well,I also doubt that there exist any methods to produce such an expression as shown. According to Wolfram Alpha ,I think actually the main part of the solution consist of the inverse function of the implicit expression above.Maybe my thought still has a little bit of use...
  13. B

    Solve the differential equation: y′′y′+yy′+yy′′=0

    Sorry,please tell me if there is anything that I should mention but I forgot. So,do you mean that this equation cannot be solved analytically? By the way,I tried this substitution from this :
  14. B

    Solve the differential equation: y′′y′+yy′+yy′′=0

    I tried the substitution ##y=e^{\int z(x)}##,##z(x)## is an arbitrary function to be determined. Substitute this to the original differential equation,and dividing ##y^2## yields ##(z+1)z'+z^3+z^2+z=0##,which is a first order differential equation. Trying to solve this first order differential...
  15. B

    Question about the derivation of linear magnification

    Oh,and sorry for typos.It should be ##\tan (i_2)=\frac {h_i}{ v}##. Well,I found the relevant diagram just next page of the posted page of Pedrotti,sorry for bringing everyone much trouble. Thank you.
Back
Top