Classical Opinions about these textbooks for vibrations and waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting textbooks for a first-year physics course on Vibrations and Waves. The recommended texts are French's "Vibrations and Waves" and Pain's "The Physics of Vibrations and Waves." There are mixed reviews about Pain's textbook, with some users finding it mediocre. French's book is perceived as a better option for self-study. Additionally, Rabinovich's "Oscillations and Waves" and Kneubühl's "Oscillations and Waves" are considered advanced and may not be suitable for beginners, as they are more appropriate for upper-level undergraduate or graduate students. The consensus suggests that focusing on the recommended texts, particularly French, is advisable for foundational understanding.
Baal Hadad
Messages
17
Reaction score
2
Hi.

I am going to enter uni this October as a first year physics major.One of the first courses I will take is Vibrations and Waves,and the recommended materials are as below:

French,Vibrations and Waves
Pain,The Physics of Vibrations and Waves, 6th Edition

According to Amazon's review,there are some complaints about Pain's textbook.

I am trying to have some self study before entering uni.So,is French better than Pain for self study?

And also will Rabinovich's "Oscillations and Waves: In Linear and Nonlinear Systems" and Kneubühl's "Oscillations and Waves" become good supplements for the module?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used an earlier edition of Pain for a part of a physics class 30 years ago, and thought it wasn't great or horrible. It was mediocre. I've flipped through French before and it looked better than Pain, but I don't have a lot of experience with it.

Some online resources at about the same level are
https://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~hgeorgi/new.htm
https://scholar.harvard.edu/david-morin/waves
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/315.html

When I took such a course it was mostly about electromagnetic waves, and the primary book was Bekefi and Barrett
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0262520478/?tag=pfamazon01-20
which I thought was excellent, but if your course doesn't emphasize electromagnetic waves very much then you should skip it. As a warning, it looks like it was typeset with an old-fashioned typewriter.

Jason
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Baal Hadad
jasonRF said:
I used an earlier edition of Pain for a part of a physics class 30 years ago, and thought it wasn't great or horrible. It was mediocre. I've flipped through French before and it looked better than Pain, but I don't have a lot of experience with it.

Some online resources at about the same level are
https://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~hgeorgi/new.htm
https://scholar.harvard.edu/david-morin/waves
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/315/315.html

When I took such a course it was mostly about electromagnetic waves, and the primary book was Bekefi and Barrett
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0262520478/?tag=pfamazon01-20
which I thought was excellent, but if your course doesn't emphasize electromagnetic waves very much then you should skip it. As a warning, it looks like it was typeset with an old-fashioned typewriter.

Jason
Thanks for your advice. I think that I will go for French.Besides,do you have any experience for the two books above(Kneubühl and Rabinovich)?
 
I looked at both on amazon. They are both more advanced - more suitable for advanced undergraduate or perhaps even graduate students. If your course is based on French and Pain then I think those books will not be helpful.
Jason
 
  • Like
Likes Baal Hadad
jasonRF said:
I looked at both on amazon. They are both more advanced - more suitable for advanced undergraduate or perhaps even graduate students. If your course is based on French and Pain then I think those books will not be helpful.
Jason
Thanks. Maybe that's why they aren't as popular as popular textbooks such as French or Pain.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
424
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top