https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5lv4nlunn35ok8/phy1.PNG?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ktc9pj7qmqhejrv/phy2.PNG?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qbjz1p1gokvsgj2/Capture3.PNG?dl=0
I googled "polarizer film diagram" and "malu's law" and "polarizer physics" to obtain the pictures in this thread.
I...
Ahh yes ! Okay, i understand better now.
Yes, no energy is needed for an electron to maintain an orbit as acceleration is perpendicular to direction of motion
Removing e- from a atom or transitioning it to a higher energy level requires energy.
I realized my misconception.
What about the...
Ahh yes ! Okay, i understand better now.
Yes, no energy is needed for an electron to maintain an orbit as acceleration is perpendicular to direction of motion
Removing e- from a atom or transitioning it to a higher energy level requires energy.
Thank you , orodruin !
Alright, maybe not directly related. E=WD/t =(F×D)/t
Would u elucidate abt my first point regarding energy,
And the 2nd point regarding that e- further away having weaker attraction compared to a e- nearer to nucleus,
Both points in which are contrary to the fact that electron shells of...
Using electrical potential energy =1/4πεo Q1Q2/r , a particle further away from nucleus has lower magnitude of energy
Using coulomb's law, a particle further away from nucleus experiences weaker attraction, hence less energy is needed to maintain orbit* around that e-shell compared to a...
Using electrical potential energy =1/4πεo Q1Q2/r , a particle further away from nucleus has lower magnitude of energy
Using coulomb's law, a particle further away from nucleus experiences weaker attraction, hence less energy is needed to maintain orbit* around that e-shell compared to a...