Recent content by DavidK
-
D
Graduate A little problem involving unitary matrices
Matt you don't happen to have a good reference for what you wrote above? You see, I'm using the fact that Tr(U^k) can't be zero for all k if U is unitary in a text I'm writing, but I do not want to litter the text with details regarding this fact. Any help would be highly appreciated.- DavidK
- Post #6
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
D
Graduate A little problem involving unitary matrices
I could mention that I have a very strong hunch that the largest possible value for n is N, and that this value is reached for unitaries of the form [U]_{kl} = \delta_{k+1 mod(N),l} .- DavidK
- Post #4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
D
Graduate A little problem involving unitary matrices
Assume U is a NxN unitary matrix. Further assume that for all k<n: Tr(U^k)=0. What is the larges possible value for n?- DavidK
- Thread
- Matrices
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
D
Is Handling the Most Over Called Foul in Soccer?
I'm not 100% sure about the subtleties of the rules regarding when using your hands is regarded as unitentional. However, Nesta shoved the ball away from himself with his arm and hand. It was probably just a reflex movement, but the situation differs somewhat from ordinary situations judged as...- DavidK
- Post #24
- Forum: General Discussion
-
D
Is Handling the Most Over Called Foul in Soccer?
It is difficult to know if it was a conscious choice or not, it wasn't however obviously unintentional. I would have to see the situation again to be sure.- DavidK
- Post #19
- Forum: General Discussion
-
D
Is Handling the Most Over Called Foul in Soccer?
This is a crazy match. I don't think the referee sucks, however he has to make a lot of difficult decisions. He missed an obvious penalty kick though (Nesta used his hand). Regarding the US team, the swedish television commentators call their efforts heroic.- DavidK
- Post #13
- Forum: General Discussion
-
D
Graduate Which Unitary Matrices Keep A - UBU† Positive Definite?
I think I have solved the problem for the 2\times2 case. A positive matrix A can in this case be expressed as: A=\frac{\mbox{Tr}(A)}{2}(I+r_x \sigma_x+r_y\sigma_y + r_z \sigma_z), where \sigma_x, \sigma_y, \sigma_z are the standard Pauli matrices, and \bar{r}_a=(r_x,r_y,r_z) is a...- DavidK
- Post #4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
D
Graduate Which Unitary Matrices Keep A - UBU† Positive Definite?
An Hermitian matrix H is positive definite if all its eigenvalues are nonzero and positive. Assume that the matrices A,B are positve definite, and that the difference A-B is positve definite. Now, for which unitary matrices, U , is it true that the matrix A-UBU^{\dagger} is positve...- DavidK
- Thread
- Matrices Positive
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
D
Graduate Is There a Preferred Lorentz Frame in the CMB?
Ahhh...now it all makes sense again :approve: . -
D
Graduate Is There a Preferred Lorentz Frame in the CMB?
Thanks for the very informative answer. A natural follow up question is: why is the Earth at rest relative the CMB? Is it something one should expect? -
D
Graduate Is There a Preferred Lorentz Frame in the CMB?
Consider two farmes of reference moving relative each other. In one of the frames the CMD is fully isotropic, i.e., it looks the same in all directions. In the other frame however, the CMD should be red shifted in one direction and blue shifted in the other direction. Thus, the first frame can... -
D
Graduate What does it mean by having a quantum fidelity of 0.85?
The fidelity can be viewed as a meassurement of distance between quantum states. If the fidelity is close to one, the states are close.- DavidK
- Post #2
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
D
Graduate Two similar Bayesian problems. Did I get them right?
Yes I did :blushing:- DavidK
- Post #6
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
D
Graduate Diagonalizability (in Hilbert Spaces)
In the finite dimensional case a linear operator, A, is diagonalizable if it is normal, i.e. AA^{\dagger}=A^{\dagger}A.- DavidK
- Post #4
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
D
Graduate Two similar Bayesian problems. Did I get them right?
I would suggest that you use the formula: P(A|B)= \frac{P(B)P(B|A)}{P(A)} instead. In the first example A is "the box contains 10 balls" and B is "You pick ball number 9", we get P(B)= \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{100}), P(B|A)= \frac{1}{10}, and P(A)=\frac{1}{2}. Hence P(A|B)=...- DavidK
- Post #4
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics