Recent content by EV33

  1. E

    Interchanging Limits: When Does Equality Hold?

    Thank you so much. My function is continuous.
  2. E

    Interchanging Limits: When Does Equality Hold?

    Homework Statement I was trying to prove something and I ended up in a situation similar to, (limit t\rightarrow0)(limit s\rightarrow0) f(x+s,y+t) =(limit s\rightarrow0)(limit t\rightarrow0)f(x+s,y+t) My question is when does this equality hold. I can't find it anywhere...
  3. E

    Understanding Modules: Definition and Properties for Homework

    Homework Statement I am curious if all modules contain 0. Homework Equations A left R-module M over the ring R consists of an abelian group (M, +) and an operation R × M → M such that certain properties hold... The Attempt at a Solution The definition of a module says that it is an...
  4. E

    What is the contradiction in the proof for M/I\subseteqJ/I and M\subseteqJ?

    Homework Statement I am curious, if I,J, and M are ideals of the commutative ring R, and M/I\subseteqJ/I, then M\subseteqJHomework Equations M/I = { m+I : m is in M} J/I = { j+I : j is in J} I\subseteqR is an ideal if 1.) if a and b are in I then a+b is in I 2.) if r is in R and a is in I...
  5. E

    Proving r is in I if rn in I | 65 Characters

    Ok. So I get 32=9=0 mod 9. So 32 is an element of 9z. By definition 3 is an element of 9z. So I get that it holds for this case. That's what I was supposed to get right?
  6. E

    Proving r is in I if rn in I | 65 Characters

    By what you wrote makes me think you were thinking of the converse of my statement. Were you just showing that it, in fact, is an iff statement?
  7. E

    Proving r is in I if rn in I | 65 Characters

    Homework Statement In the process of trying to prove something else I found it would be helpful if rn\inI, where I is an ideal, n\inN, and r\inR and R is a ring, then r is in I. Homework Equations I is an ideal if a\inI and b\inI then a+b\inI, a\inI and r\inR then ar\inI, and I is not the empty...
  8. E

    Simple questions about Lp spaces

    Sorry, this should have have been posted in the calculus and beyond section.
  9. E

    Simple questions about Lp spaces

    Homework Statement My question is just on the definition of L∞. Is L∞=Lp where p=∞, i.e., is a measurable function in L∞ if ∫Alf(x)l∞<∞? Homework Equations *L∞: The space of all bounded measurable functions on [0,1] (bounded except for possibly on a set of measure zero) *A measurable...
  10. E

    Proving Non-Negativity and Monotonicity of Integrals over a Measure Space

    Homework Statement My question is would I be allowed to say, if lf+-\phil<ε/(2\mu(E) then ∫E lf+-\phil<ε/2 Homework Equations E is the set in which we are integrating over. \mu is the measure \varphi is a simple function f+ is the non-negative part of the function f. The Attempt...
  11. E

    Simple measure theory questions (inverse image)

    Homework Statement I was wondering if we Let E be some set such that f-1(E) is measurable then so is f-1(E)c.Homework Equations If the set A is measurable then so is its compliment. The Attempt at a Solution I think the statement is true because f-1(E) is just a set and thus its compliment...
  12. E

    Difference between 2 types of differentials?

    I have a simple question about differentials. I have been taught two ways to find the differential and my questions is in what situations do I use each one? simply speaking these are the 2 ways 1.) just take the partials of each component function and throw them in a matrix 2.) Let f be the...
  13. E

    Differential of map from surface to surface

    Never Mind. I figured it out.
  14. E

    Differential of map from surface to surface

    Homework Statement Does anyone know the process for finding the differential of of f:S→S' where S,S' are surfaces. My textbook explains how to do this when f is a vector valued function but in the problem that I am working on I have something like f(x,y)=(g(x),h(x),j(y)) rather than something...
  15. E

    Differential Geometry/notation help

    Homework Statement I have this theorem which I am having trouble understanding due to notation. Theorem: Define S,S'\subseteqℝ3 to be surfaces. Let f:S→S' be a smooth map. f is a local isometry if for all p in S, and all w1,w2 in TpS, <w1,w2>=<dfp(w1),dfp(w2)>. The thing I don't...
Back
Top