Recent content by letumio

i think I am following and i believe i recall a krauss lecture to that end. i appreciate the help and time very much, i clearly have to read far more into quantum mechanics before i can even pretend grasp it!

well now I am confused again...if the remote particle can't be acted on even by the black hole?

so one could, in theory, toss one into a black hole and measure the other "as if" so, in theory, we have a way of measuring a particle fall into a black hole until the entanglement breaks. and better yet, we could, theoretically, toss that particle to the black hole far faster than any classic...

sorry i guess my true question is what happens when u have one of the entangled particles moving near the speed of light, if lorentz doesn't transfer, what else does and doesn't copy? mass, time dialation, ect. (velocity doesn't obviously) so does it nullify the effects of e=mC2, sorry one more...

so entanglement has limited effect on its counterpart and isn't truly a "realtime copy" particle? are there other properties that don't follow suit in regards to entangled particles(such as mass increase as a result of the high speed)? to be clear i didnt mean the particle at rest would...

can lorentz contraction be measured via quantum entanglement with one of the entangled particles moving near the speed of light? would the particle in motion be affected by lorentz contraction? if so, would the particle at rest follow suit and appear affected?