Recent content by oldspice1212

  1. O

    Engineering Is a Transition from Meteorology to Engineering Feasible?

    Go with it man, take the courses and get them over with. I've realized there's a lot of discouragement on this forum, so if you want to go for something; get on it, ambition is what counts, but if you want to listen to others and keep asking these questions that's up to you. Anyways good luck...
  2. O

    Are Constraints Necessary in Hamiltonian Dynamics?

    Nvm, I was wrong! Thanks anyways, we do include the constrain!
  3. O

    Are Constraints Necessary in Hamiltonian Dynamics?

    Hi there, I'm reading on the hamiltonian method and it says we can ignore constraints? Is this true, or am I missing something here, so if we have a constraint in the system we do not have to include it in the final calculation for the equation of motion? Hope someone could clear this up, thanks!
  4. O

    Hamiltonian Method: Getting Final Equation of Motion

    Hey, I was hoping someone could clear this up for me. When using this method, how do you get the final equation of motion, that's where I am confused. So I know I start off using Lagrangian (T - U) -> momentum (partial L/ partial q dot) -> Hamiltonian T+U, and then using the hamiltonian...
  5. O

    Conservation of energy, object at rest

    Hey CW, sorry this question was very vague I agree as I look at it now. But, you said KE doesn't have a velocity? Are you just saying that because initially the system was at rest (so KE = 0)? Because KE = 1/2mv^2.
  6. O

    Conservation of energy, object at rest

    Yes, sort of, I was thinking more so for planetary motions, so let's say: If two masses are separated by a radius...and released from rest, I would say the same thing applies right?
  7. O

    Conservation of energy, object at rest

    Hey, Say we have an object released at rest, separated by a certain distance..blah, blah, blah. When we use conservation of energy here, the kinetic energy would have a initial velocity right? So, K1+U1=K2+U2 assuming the object eventually comes to a rest...so U1 = 0, K2 = 0, so we would have...
  8. O

    Is Kinetic Energy Equal to Negative Potential Energy in Circular Orbital Motion?

    Interesting, because recently I did a problem, for which the kinetic energy remained the same and the potential energy had changed, so that is where most of the confusion comes from.
  9. O

    Is Kinetic Energy Equal to Negative Potential Energy in Circular Orbital Motion?

    Hey, so I have a question about motions of planets and their energy basically. When we have a circular orbit, why is it that the kinetic energy is just the opposite of potential energy? (Assuming it's a closed orbit) Like if we have U = something, than the kinetic energy T = -1/2U? This would...
  10. O

    Potential Energy Homework: Solving F(r) = -k(r-a)

    Yes, that's must easier to see! Thank you so much!
  11. O

    Potential Energy Homework: Solving F(r) = -k(r-a)

    I didn't upload any pics, was just making sure, and yes that makes sense, thank you :)
  12. O

    Potential Energy Homework: Solving F(r) = -k(r-a)

    Homework Statement The net force on the mass is the central force F(r) = -k(r-a). Find the potential energy U(r). a is the spring of natural length and k is spring constant k. Homework Equations -dU/dx = F(x) The Attempt at a Solution F(r) = - \frac{ dU }{ dr } implies -k(r-a) = - \frac{ dU...
  13. O

    What force classically held electron in the orbit?

    Thank you everyone, you have answered my question. I appreciate it!
  14. O

    What force classically held electron in the orbit?

    Hey, what force classically held electron in the orbit? Also what force is it actually (quantum mechanics). I think it was the electromagnetic force classically, I haven't been able to find a legit source that says it was directly that, but when I do calculations with electrons and atoms I'm...
  15. O

    Trajectory (Quick Question) -- where would it be maximum speed?

    Hey, sorry about that, it was just a random question I found haha. I figured it out though, thanks :)
Back
Top