Recent content by rhyshanan

http://www.wired.com/2007/10/dark-energy-exp/ Yes the universe expands isotropically as far as we know. The coin/cone was a simplified analogy. The theory referred more to the pull towards the event horizon than towards the center. In this case, the moving away would not only be appear from the...

Thank you for your passionate responses guys ... I'm glad to see the community is as eager as me to learn and exchange theories ... Have you ever dropped a coin in one of those big upside down icecream cone shaped shapes? ... so the coin travels round and round and round, goes faster and...

Instead of being a force that works against gravity. Is it possible that dark energy is the pulling of everything towards the event horizon of a black hole? This would marry dark energy with gravity and replace myserious massive amount of energy with a logical source of energy/force that we know...

True. Couldn't a carriership deliver 'solar satellites' to collect a stars energy and direct that energy in a straight line ... creating a kind of solar sail? I picked the concept up from one of stephen hawkings documentaries. I guess they would run out of satellites if they get left behind.

agreed. Stars are like oasis in the space desert. A spaceship would need to farm and store energy from stars, hopping from one to the next. The barrier of time may be overcome by traveling through bent space which is theoretially possible, though a long way off.

You just gave me an idea, what if solar satellites, orbiting the sun were able to send energy through beams down to powerplant on earth, wouldn't that cut carbon emissions? it would also be a fine line to the weaponization of space, i suppose

i don't see how this is possble.

I'm trying to say our current level of technology does not allow for us to answer this question. Maybe someone else will have another theory like. bigger galaxy more dark matter, but it will just be a theory becasue there is no way to know with the technology we have

Well the only way people know dark matter exists is because of the gravity dark matter creates. things around dark matter will have strange orbits that signal that there must be an invisible object close by with gravity influancing the observerd object. Our best telescopes can hardly see our...

well i don't have time for referances but you question would relate to the longevity of stars. dark matter is only dark because we can't see it. We can't see dark matter because there no light (stars) to eluminate them. So if older galaxies have less stars then yes, more dark matter. I think...

the matter falling in them might be.

Ever since I saw stephen hawkings universe doc's, I've been wondering about one creative scenario he presented. surround our sun with solar energy satellites. Draw and store the energy in the satellites. satellites fire this energy in beams (synchronized) into one satellite which then...

thanks very much for the response. sorry for my spelling and thanks for the correction. However, time dilation at the atomic level (as an observer) is meaningful for a theory I'm tinkering with.

For instance, if an explosion occurs, particles move very energetically. Would the speed of these particles create a time dilation relative the the size of those particles? Also, gravitys affect (or the lack thereof) on particles, would this create an opposite effect to time dilation occurring...

Hi, I'm looking for any resources explaining time dilation at the atomic level. I can't find anything on it sooo If anyone could please refer me that would be helpful. kind regards