Literacy Falls for Graduates From College, Testing Finds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    College Testing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a troubling decline in English literacy among American college graduates, as evidenced by the National Assessment of Adult Literacy results from 2003, which showed that only 31 percent of graduates scored at a proficient level, down from 40 percent in 1992. The test indicated significant declines in literacy among Hispanic graduates, while literacy improved for black and Asian graduates. Concerns were raised about the impact of increased television and internet usage on literacy skills, with skepticism regarding the validity of attributing the decline solely to these factors. The conversation also criticized the commodification of educational credentials and the perceived dumbing down of curricula in U.S. schools, noting the removal of rigorous academic requirements over the decades. The lack of advanced courses and foreign language offerings in public schools, particularly in New Mexico, further underscores the challenges facing education today.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,363
Reaction score
7,196
This is troubling, since the state and federal governements like to tout their successes in education.

The average American college graduate's literacy in English declined significantly over the past decade, according to results of a nationwide test released yesterday.

The National Assessment of Adult Literacy, given in 2003 by the Department of Education, is the nation's most important test of how well adult Americans can read.

The test also found steep declines in the English literacy of Hispanics in the United States, and significant increases among blacks and Asians.

When the test was last administered, in 1992, 40 percent of the nation's college graduates scored at the proficient level, meaning that they were able to read lengthy, complex English texts and draw complicated inferences. But on the 2003 test, only 31 percent of the graduates demonstrated those high-level skills. There were 26.4 million college graduates.

The college graduates who in 2003 failed to demonstrate proficiency included 53 percent who scored at the intermediate level and 14 percent who scored at the basic level, meaning they could read and understand short, commonplace prose texts.

Three percent of college graduates who took the test in 2003, representing some 800,000 Americans, demonstrated "below basic" literacy, meaning that they could not perform more than the simplest skills, like locating easily identifiable information in short prose.

Grover J. Whitehurst, director of an institute within the Department of Education that helped to oversee the test, said he believed that the literacy of college graduates had dropped because a rising number of young Americans in recent years had spent their free time watching television and surfing the Internet.
NY Times, Dec 16, 2005
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Grover J. Whitehurst, director of an institute within the Department of Education that helped to oversee the test, said he believed that the literacy of college graduates had dropped because a rising number of young Americans in recent years had spent their free time watching television and surfing the Internet.
And the content of what people read or watch on television or the internet is irrelevant? If that isn't what he meant to say, I think they should correct it. And if it is what he meant to say, I'd sure like to hear the explanation. Sheesh, people can use television and the internet to improve their literacy. I wonder if they published a copy of that article on the internet. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I think Whitehurst was thinking of 'reality TV' or sitcoms like 'Friends', rather than 'The Discovery Channel', 'National Geographic channel', or 'History Channel'. It does seem to be a gross generalization to simply blame falling literacy rates on TV and internet.

On the other hand, if people do not read, they will not improve ready comprehension.
 
Troubling? Yes.

"... since the state and federal governements like to tout their successes in education." Most govt. "successes" are claimed for public schools --- college and university level education is funded to various degrees by fed. and state govts., but "accreditation" and rankings are "internally" generated by the "academic community." Even more bothersome.

"Credentials" have become a commodity in this country, and to an extent, globally; colleges and universities deal in these commodities for large cash rewards, and quality control went out the window long ago --- once administrators realized that flunking kids out cuts off the cash flow, the underwater basket weaving courses were added, the "Xyz Studies" majors (sociology and anthropology for the innumerate) were recognized, and campuses turned into giant day care centers.
 
40 years ago, the graduate school I attended required reading proficiency in two foreign languages for the PhD degree - by passing fairly tough ETS exams. My department required me to pass German because at that time a lot of Botanical Literature was still in German.

All foreign language requirements were removed in 1980.

The dumbing down of curricula in the US is not new. My father took the equivalent of freshman analysis in the second year of high school in 1922...in New York City public schools. I still have his report card - B+. He also took Latin and Greek that year. He didn't get a B+ in those subjects. :D

The public schools here in New Mexico only offer AP calc to "acheivers", and then only as a 12th grader. There are no Latin or Greek courses anywhere in the public schools here, AFAIK. Only about 1 in 5 high schools here even has an AP calculus class offered. If a student attends a HS that does not offer the class, he/she is bussed across town.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
50
Views
8K
Back
Top