Is Time Travel Through Communication with the Past Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sneil
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A recent article discusses a scientist's claim that future technology will enable communication with our past selves, specifically allowing individuals to send verbal instructions to themselves from 30 minutes earlier. Critics argue that the proposed method, which involves rewinding matter to extract past interactions, is fundamentally flawed. The discussion highlights that such a process contradicts established principles in physics, particularly the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which prevents precise knowledge of atomic states. While some theories in physics suggest time travel might be theoretically possible, the consensus is that the claims made in the article are implausible and lack scientific credibility.
Sneil
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
This is an article about some scientist who claimes he is/will be able to see and hear into the past. He claims in 20 years we'll have the technology to "talk" to ourselves in the past, say at our desk 30 min earlier and pass on instruction "verbally" through whatever means he claims to possess.

http://www.impactlab.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=7467

I know this article is obviously bs as the method he describes to accomplish his theory requires him to virtually rewind matter and extract past physical iteractions from an object. meaning look at the current energetic states of all the atoms in an object and derrive how the atoms current state originated. Sorry to post this but there are people on a non-physics forum i frequent that believe what is being said is possible. I apologize for posting this but my current grasp with physics is not enough to elegantly explain why his proposal is completely impossible. Could someone give a thurough explanation expalining why physically it is not possible?
If it is a complete waste of your time for me to posting this then i apaolgize.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, so a guy without a name who is unfunded and works alone in his basement says so. Well, I'm convinced. :rolleyes:

However, there is no absolute answer as to what is possible here. From what I read of the big names in physics, most people point to various paradoxes that would seem to render travel to the past impossible. However, there are solutions to the equations of General Relativity that suggest time travel to the past might be possible, and people have been playing with this for quite some time now - closed timelike curves. And there are a number of designs for time machines that some qualified people have argued might actually work, so, to the best of my knowledge the door is closing for now but not completely shut on this idea.

Still, the page linked is bogus.
 
Sneil said:
This is an article about some scientist who claimes he is/will be able to see and hear into the past. He claims in 20 years we'll have the technology to "talk" to ourselves in the past, say at our desk 30 min earlier and pass on instruction "verbally" through whatever means he claims to possess.
That sounds like somthing form star trek.
 
Sneil said:
I know this article is obviously bs as the method he describes to accomplish his theory requires him to virtually rewind matter and extract past physical iteractions from an object. meaning look at the current energetic states of all the atoms in an object and derrive how the atoms current state originated.
There is no way to look at the curreny energetic states of the atoms, since it goes against the Principle of Uncertainty. It is all BS.
 
thanks for the replies:smile:
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top