Two Particles in a Box: Similar Velocities, Momentum, or Kinetic Energy?

AI Thread Summary
In a box with two interacting particles, it is suggested that their momenta would likely approach equality over many interactions, especially during collisions. This is based on the idea that momentum tends to be conserved and redistributed during physical interactions. In contrast, the velocities and kinetic energies of the particles may not converge in the same way. The discussion references a thermodynamic theorem indicating that identical particles will, on average, have equal kinetic energies due to energy distribution among degrees of freedom. Overall, the behavior of these particles is influenced by their interactions and the nature of their collisions.
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Hello,

Say you have a box with two (interacting) particles in them. If you had to venture a guess, what would be most reasonable: that they both have similar velocities, similar momenta or similar kinetic energies? (Or perhaps none of the above?)

NB: with "similar" I mean "of comparable magnitude"
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'd say that this question can't probably be answered in a general way. If the interaction involved is physical (like the two particles bouncing into each other), my guess would be that over an arbitrarily large amount of interactions the two particles momenta would approach equality. I would say neither of the other two values would approach each other, and that this situation would change if the interaction changed.
 


And why would you think that the momenta would approach equality?
 


More a guess than anything, it seems to be than in realistic collisions between two bodies the difference in momentum would be less after the collision.
 


Actually, there is a theorem in Thermodynamics that states that on average, available energy is distributed equally between available degrees of freedom. That means that if particles are identical, they will, on average, have equal kinetic energies.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top