Question about level splitting in band theory

ahmeeeeeeeeee
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello ,

about the band theory I was confused some how

seeing the attached image I ask :-

1- when the atoms are far away we take a single atom alone as a system , but when atoms get closer we identify them all as the system , right ?!

2- why do we use the word " splitting" , why don't we say that every atom contributes with its _ for example_ 2s level and so the overall 2s can carry more electrons ?!

3- does the whole band have the same energy ?! if so why do we represent the increase of electron's energy by farther " rising" in conduction band ?! and if not why is there difference in energy ?!

4- I have to say that I'm studying this as an introduction to semi-conductor devices not physics course .
 

Attachments

  • ph.jpg
    ph.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 773
Physics news on Phys.org
1. yes.

2. Its just a choice of word. When describing the graph it seems as if the line is split into two.

3. No. The difference in energy is due to orbital overlap integral.

4. Hahaha. If you want to dig deeper into semiconductor you better learn the physics anyway.
 
To give an informative but non-exact picture, you can first imagine a charge q that has a lot of discrete energy levels around. If you increase the amount of the charge, these levels would get closer to each other (and when you make two atoms close together, it is like that you have a bigger system with larger amount of charges and closer energy levels) so that in the limit you gather a lot of atoms, the levels get very close and make a continuous energy band.
 
Last edited:
1 far away enough that they do not affect each other, that is why we regard them as two alone systems.
2 "splitting" is referring to the energy,
3 of course different as the picture implies due to Pauli's exclusion principle,
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top