Question about relative speeds.

  • Thread starter Thread starter port31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
AI Thread Summary
In a collision between a moving object with speed v_1 and mass m_1 and a stationary object with mass m_2, momentum conservation leads to the equation m_1 v_1 = (m_1 + m_2)v_2 for the final speed v_2. Analyzing from the rest frame of m_1 suggests that m_2 moves towards it at speed v_1, leading to a different equation m_2(-v_1) = (m_1 + m_2)v_2. The perceived discrepancy arises from using different reference frames, which results in different final speeds. However, when transforming the results back to the original frame by adding v_1, the speeds align, confirming the consistency of momentum conservation across frames. This illustrates the importance of reference frames in analyzing collisions.
port31
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Lets say I have a moving object that has speed v_1
and mass m_1 and it collides with a more massive object of
mass m_2 And this mass is at rest and when they collide they stick together.
If I use momentum conservation I would get
m_1 v_1=(m_1+m_2)(v_2) and v_2 is the speed after the collision
but what if I wanted to analyze this from the rest frame of m_1
It would look as if the more massive object was moving at me at a speed v_1
So now I would have m_2(-v_1)=(m_1+m_2)(v_2) the final speeds would be different in those 2 cases so what's wrong with my reasoning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The final speeds would indeed be different because you are using a different reference frame. To check to make sure there is no conflict, compare the before and after speeds of each object. The difference should be the same regardless of which frame you choose.
 
port31 said:
So now I would have m_2(-v_1)=(m_1+m_2)(v_2) the final speeds would be different in those 2 cases so what's wrong with my reasoning.
If you now transform your answer to the original frame (by adding v_1) you'll find that the speeds match.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top