.CNF files conversion, SPEDAC Pro

  • Thread starter Thread starter we are the robots
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    files
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need to convert .cnf files from Canberra's format to other formats compatible with Ortec's Maestro or simple channel-counts files. Users are exploring options for the SPEDAC-Pro software, which is difficult to find, and discussing the necessity of the sad.dll file for conversion, typically included with Canberra's Genie2K package. One participant successfully downloaded WinSPEDAC but encountered issues due to missing executable files and the required DLL. There is a suggestion to contact users from universities or research institutions for assistance with Genie2K. Ultimately, one user reported successfully obtaining the sad.dll file, resolving their conversion issue.
we are the robots
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I need to convert files in Canberra's file format .cnf to any other one supported
by Ortec's Maestro, or even better, to a simple channel-counts file.
I found this page:

www-naweb.iaea.org/napc/physics/PS/Softwares/Spedac.htm

It's supposed to be a graphical user interface for SPEDAC-Pro for DOS,
but I can't find this last one.

Does anyone know where can I get SPEDAC-Pro (or have it, if it's freeware),
or another conversion program, please?

Of course, any other freeware (or trial, with all the functions working) gamma spectroscopy software capable of opening them would be ok.

Obviously, I don't have Genie 2K for conversion, and SPECON doesn't do it.

Other output formats that would be ok are: rbs, chn, spc, spt, spm, as1, as2, ans, sen, snf, spe, ana, mpa, mcs.

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
we are the robots said:
www-naweb.iaea.org/napc/physics/PS/Softwares/Spedac.htm

It's supposed to be a graphical user interface for SPEDAC-Pro for DOS,
but I can't find this last one.
I found that page, and it has link to

WinSPEDACSetupRelease22.exe

Where is says "To download the program, click here." on the left side - here is the link. The one on the right is a link to the help file.

I was able to successully the installation file. I placed the cursor on the link, clicked the right mouse button, and selected "Save Target As".

There is not much if any information about SPEDAC-Pro abailable on the web. It seems to be an IAEA product, and you would have to contact the software group at that organization.
 
Astronuc, of course I downloaded WinSPEDAC, but it seemed it lacked the DOS executable files. Yesterday I found a separate folder containing those .exe files.
But now it asks for the sad.dll for conversion from .cnf to other formats.
Too sad, really, because I found that the dll library comes only with Canberra's Genie2K package. Bad. :(
Now I'm asking to Canberra if they PLEASE could send me that file...
Well, thank you anyway.
 
we are the robots said:
Astronuc, of course I downloaded WinSPEDAC, but it seemed it lacked the DOS executable files. Yesterday I found a separate folder containing those .exe files.
But now it asks for the sad.dll for conversion from .cnf to other formats.
Too sad, really, because I found that the dll library comes only with Canberra's Genie2K package. Bad. :(
Now I'm asking to Canberra if they PLEASE could send me that file...
Well, thank you anyway.
My apologies, I misunderstood your comment about the download. I thought you were have trouble with that.

It appears IAEA assumes the user has Genie2K. If its not avaiable from Canberra, then perhaps you could contact a user, such as one at a university or research institution. Of hand, I don't know any Genie2K users.
 
Thank you.
That's my approach now, contacting a Genie2k user...
I found a program which can read .cnf files, but it doesn't recognize the calibration nor real and elapsed times.
Anyway, I still need the sad.dll file, if someone has Genie2K and reads this...
 
I got it! :D
Everything ok now.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Back
Top