What Makes Mandlebrot and Julia Sets Fascinating in Fractal Mathematics?

AI Thread Summary
Fractal mathematics, particularly Mandlebrot and Julia sets, captivates enthusiasts due to their intricate patterns generated by simple algorithms. Users can start exploring fractals by downloading software like Winfract or Fractint, which are compatible with various Windows versions. The discussion highlights the significant advancements in computing power, noting that programs that once took hours to run now complete in seconds. Julia sets are defined by specific complex number sequences, while the Mandlebrot set serves as an index for these Julia sets based on convergence criteria. The fascination with fractals lies in their ability to produce complex visuals from straightforward mathematical principles.
Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I am sure the same goes for you lot, I am fascinated by the complex patterns of fractals and recently found out it is generated by extremely simple algorithms (which takes weeks to run).

What do I actually need run some algorithms that generates fractals?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
"Which takes weeks to run"? What vintage computer are you running these things on?

Many years ago, I wrote a program to draw Mandlebrot's set (and the Julia sets). I would start it running and go to class. When I got back about an hour later, it would be almost finished! Now exactly the same program take a few seconds.

Julia sets, Jc, are those starting points (thought of as complex numbers: (x,y)= x+ iy= z), z0, for which the sequence zn+1= zn2+ c converges.
The Mandlebrot set, sort of an "index" to Julia sets, are those c values for which zn+1= zn2+ c, with z0= 0, converges.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top