Newtonian Gravity: Describing as Vector Field

AI Thread Summary
Newtonian gravity can be described as a vector field generated by a mass located at a specific point in space. The gravitational force per unit mass at any other point is given by a formula that accounts for the distance between the two points and the mass involved. This force can be expressed in Cartesian coordinates or transformed into spherical coordinates, emphasizing the radial nature of gravitational attraction. The force acting on another mass is derived by multiplying the gravitational field by the mass of the object. Overall, this framework illustrates how gravity operates as a vector field in space.
captain
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
how would you describe Newtonian gravity as a vector field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, as a simple case, suppose you've got a mass positioned at location \vec{x}_{0}=(x_{0},y_{0},z_{0}) with mass m_{0}

Then, for any spatial point (x,y,z)=\vec{x}\neq\vec{x}_{0}
that mass generates at that point a force per unit mass:
\vec{f}(x,y,z)=-\frac{Gm_{0}}{||\vec{x}-\vec{x}_{0}||^{3}}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}_{0})

The force \vec{F} acting upon an object of mass M situated at (x,y,z) is then found by multiplying f with M.
 
Another form you sometimes see assumes that the mass is at the origin, and uses spherical coordinates:

\vec F (r, \theta, \phi) = - \frac{G m_0}{r^2} \hat r

where \hat r is the unit vector in the outward radial direction at that particular point.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top