Coupled Oscillators: Masses m and 2m in 3l_0 String

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a system of two masses, m and 2m, connected by a light string stretched between rigid supports, where they oscillate longitudinally. The solution for their motion is derived, indicating that they oscillate in phase due to the relationship between their displacements and the tension in the string. The user seeks clarification on the correctness of their derived equations and how to demonstrate the in-phase oscillation. Additionally, a separate issue regarding a grandfather clock's pendulum syncing with a weight is mentioned, questioning whether the derived equations are relevant to this scenario. The conversation emphasizes the dynamics of oscillation and the importance of understanding the system's mechanics.
trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
The problem is:
A mass m and a mass 2m are attached to a light string of unstretched length 3l _{0}, so as to divide it into 3 equal segments. The string is streched between rigid supports a distance 3l \textgreater 3l _{0} apart and the masses are free to oscillate longitudinally. The oscillations are of small enough amplitude that the string is never slack. The tension in each segment is k times the extension. The masses are initially displaced slightly in the same direction so that mass m is held at a distance \sqrt{3} -1 further from its equilibrium position than the mass 2m. They are released simultaneously from rest.

The task is to show that they oscillate in phase and explain why.

I have found the general solution and applied the initial conditions and found the solution for this particular case to be:
{x _{1} \choose x _{2} } = {-1 - \sqrt{3} \choose 1} ( \frac{- \sqrt{3} }{2}(a+1)+ \frac{1}{2})cos \omega _{1} t+ {1- \sqrt{3} \choose 1} (a+ \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{2} (a+1)- \frac{1}{2} )cos \omega _{2}t
where I set a to be the initial displacement of mass 2m.
Is my answer correct and how do I show that the oscillate in phase?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the length(s) of the two vertical string(s) between the masses and the horizintal string?

A friend of mine spent many many hours building a very tall grandfather clock, It had a long pendulum and a weight hanging on a chain to supply mechanical power. He put in in a prominent place in his living room, on a high-pile wall-to-wall carpet. He told me that he was having a problem with the clock. Whenever the weight on the chain dropped to a point where it was level with the pendulum, it slowly began swinging back and forth, in sync with the pendulum. He asked me what was wrong with the clock and how to fix it. He was an engineer. Should I show him the above equation?
 
There are no vertical strings in this case. This just one horizontal string with two masses attached to it.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top