A question regarding synchrotron lightsources.

  • Thread starter Thread starter minerva
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Synchrotron
AI Thread Summary
A synchrotron lightsource primarily produces synchrotron and bremsstrahlung radiation from electrons, but there is a possibility of generating other ionizing radiation, such as positrons, neutrons, and protons, through electron-nucleus or photonuclear reactions. When designing radiation shielding for synchrotron facilities, it is crucial to consider not only the primary radiation types but also potential secondary radiation like neutrons. Different materials are used for shielding, with lead commonly employed for X-rays and water rich in hydrogen for neutrons. The discussion highlights the importance of comprehensive shielding strategies to ensure safety in synchrotron environments. Overall, understanding the full spectrum of radiation produced is essential for effective radiation protection.
minerva
Messages
92
Reaction score
6
Is it possible that a lightsource synchrotron can produce any form of ionising particle radiation other than the electrons and synchrotron and bremsstrahlung radiation, such as positrons, neutrons, protons or the like, via electron-nucleus or photonuclear reactions in the materials surrounding the accelerator?

Basically, when considering radiation shielding design around a synchrotron lightsource facility, do those types of radiation such as neutrons need to be considered at all, or do only the synchrotron and bremsstrahlung photons and electrons need to be considered?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi,
There are lot of light sources for e.g.,
X-ray sources can produce x-rays from electrons (like in ESRF, diamond light source, SLS).
Neutron sources produce neutrons (ILL).
And proton in PSI.
Normally shielding is done mainly for the storage ring. For X-rays lead. For neutrons water with high amount of hydrogen. I don't know about protons but it can found in home of synchrotrons.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top