Giancoli Physics Sixth Edition [Updated]

  • Thread starter Thread starter iRaid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance of calculus concepts, specifically derivatives and integrals, for students taking AP Physics B, particularly for those only enrolled in Pre-Calculus. A participant expresses concern about encountering calculus-related formulas in their physics textbook, questioning the necessity of this knowledge for the course. Others suggest consulting the course teacher or students who have previously taken the class for clarity on the prerequisites. There is also a shared confusion about why calculus is not a corequisite for AP Physics B, with some noting that the initial chapters of the textbook primarily cover limits, which they find manageable. Overall, the conversation highlights the uncertainty surrounding the integration of calculus in AP Physics B and the importance of seeking guidance from experienced individuals.
iRaid
Messages
558
Reaction score
8
Hey guys, yesterday I got my physics book in the mail and I started to browse through and look at some of the information. I noticed for 1 of the formulas and such that there was a title with "Some Derivatives and Integrals" and I'm wondering if we NEED to know this for this book, because I'll only be in Pre calc taking this.

What some of it says:
int[sin ax dx = -1/a cos ax
int[xos ax dx = 1/a sin ax

things like that..

Kinda scary for me, but why would my school only say pre calc? Btw, this is for AP Physics B not C..

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would ask the teacher of the course, or a student who has completed the course at your school. Those are the only people who can give you a reliable answer.

By the way, I too am rather baffled that calculus is not a corequisite for an AP physics course.
 
I've been looking through it and I can't find anything that has to do with calculus other than limits in the first 10 chapters, limits, I'm not worried about because they're easy (I've learned some things myself). And yeah any other opinions ;s
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
854
Replies
16
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top