How is quantum entanglement observed?

Moviemann345
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Any measurement device used to witness the phenomenom seems like it would disrupt quantum entanglement. How do scientists manage to observe it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moviemann345 said:
Any measurement device used to witness the phenomenom seems like it would disrupt quantum entanglement. How do scientists manage to observe it?

True, but the statistics after a measurement are very different from those you expect in classical physics which does not allow entanglement. The various Bell inequalities are ways of testing the theory. The simplest one is CHSH where the chances of winning a certain game should be 1/2 but are sqrt(2)/2 for entangled pairs. This can be tested. Other tests are protocols such as teleportation which cannot work without entanglement .

One of the big experimental problems with entanglement is that it is very hard to directly check if you have an entangled state until you actually use up the entanglement. (and even then it's usually a problem for a single system).

If you do have some other entanglement which you can "trust" it is possible to make a non-local measurement such as a bell measurement (not to be confused with the bell inequality) to verify if your system is entangled, this is very hard to do in experiment. What you need for that is an entangled measuring device which let's you record the modular sum of the spin in the X and Z directions.
 
Moviemann345 said:
How do scientists manage to observe it?

Fwiffo gave you a very good answer. Maybe the simplest example would be if you send 100 pairs of photons thru two parallel aligned polarizers. If the photon pairs are entangled – you will have 100% correlation, i.e. 100 measurements of (1, 0) or (0, 1) (i.e. if one photon get thru the other gets stopped).

I13-12-entanglement1.jpg


If the photon pairs are not entangled – you will have 100 random measurements of (0, 0) or (1, 1) or (1, 0) or (0, 1).

(Note: To get real violation of Bell Inequalities, you need to do more measurements on all relative angles, not only parallel.)


P.S. There is something called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation#Entanglement_swapping" is used to entangle particles that never interacted with each other!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top