The discussion centers around the memory capabilities of Intel's Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge architectures, highlighting that Sandy Bridge supports only dual-channel RAM, which limits its performance in memory-intensive applications compared to Nehalem. There is speculation about whether Ivy Bridge will incorporate triple-channel memory, as it is a 22nm die shrink of Sandy Bridge. The conversation also touches on the anticipated release of AMD's 8-core Bulldozer processors, expected around June 20th, which will utilize a new AM3+ socket that remains backwards compatible but does not support triple-channel memory. Concerns are raised about potential bottlenecks due to the reliance on dual-channel memory. Additionally, there are rumors that the enthusiast series of Ivy Bridge may feature quad-channel memory with the new socket 2011, though this would likely come with high costs for RAM modules. The performance advantages of quad-channel memory over dual and triple-channel configurations are questioned, particularly regarding which applications would benefit most from it.