Are Vacuum Fluctuations and QM Connected in Feynman Diagrams?

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
How are internal lines with no free ends of Feynman diagrams of the perturbative expansion of QFT related to the quantum tunnelling barrier's negative kinetic energy and the HUP of QM? (if they are related at all)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not a clue anyone?
Maybe quantum tunnelling is considered not mainstream?
 
Good question.

I have to look for a paper from Jaffe which explains that vacuum bubble diagrams (w/o external lines) for the Casimir effect are an "effective limit" of standard 1st order diagrams with external lines for van-der-Waals forces. If this reasoning could be used in general than vacuum bubbles might be irrelevant.
 
tom.stoer said:
Good question.

I have to look for a paper from Jaffe which explains that vacuum bubble diagrams (w/o external lines) for the Casimir effect are an "effective limit" of standard 1st order diagrams with external lines for van-der-Waals forces. If this reasoning could be used in general than vacuum bubbles might be irrelevant.

In fact my question wasn't restricted to vacuum bubbles diagrams, I was referring to virtual particles in general.
Vacuum bubbles are irrelevant (cancel) when calculating correlation functions.
 
tom.stoer said:
Good question.

I have to look for a paper from Jaffe which explains that vacuum bubble diagrams (w/o external lines) for the Casimir effect are an "effective limit" of standard 1st order diagrams with external lines for van-der-Waals forces. If this reasoning could be used in general than vacuum bubbles might be irrelevant.

You mean http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158" ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sheaf said:
You mean http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158" ?
exactly, thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top