What weight does our weighing machine show?Is it the mass or weight(mg)?

AI Thread Summary
Weighing machines typically display weight, which is the force exerted by gravity on an object, rather than mass. While mass is measured in kilograms or slugs, weight is expressed in Newtons or pounds. A spring balance measures weight as a force, while a true balance compares mass against a standard mass regardless of local gravity. Bathroom scales indicate the force between the ground and the user, which is commonly referred to as weight. It's important to note that weight can change based on the gravitational pull of different celestial bodies, unlike mass, which remains constant.
adi1998
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
What weight does our weighing machine show?Is it the mass or weight(mg)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass is in kg/ slugs. Weight is in Newtons/ Pounds...so whichever one is written is what it "shows".

It measures your weight (mg) however, and then either displays that or assumes g and converts it for you.
 
A spring balance will only register your weight (force). A true balance or a steelyard will compare the mass of your test object with a standard mass, irrespective of local g.
 
A weighing 'machine' such as bathroom scales indicates the force between the ground and your feet. If you are not accelerating vertically this is the force of gravity on you, this is what is usually called your 'weight'
 
On the balance , you have mass(kg) but many people say weight which is scientifically wrong.

Unlike your mass , your weight can vary whether it's on the moon or Earth or any planet due to the fact that gravity varies.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top