What type of op-amp is being used in this circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Op-amp
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the type of operational amplifier (op-amp) used in a specific circuit diagram. Participants explore various characteristics of the circuit, including feedback mechanisms, resistor values, and the impact of components like zener diodes. The scope includes theoretical analysis and practical problem-solving related to op-amp circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants initially consider the circuit to be a comparator but later suggest it resembles an amplifier with feedback due to the connections between Vout, V-, and V+.
  • One participant proposes that the circuit could be in saturated mode, given the defined output current of 3 mA.
  • There is a discussion about the effect of the zener diode on the circuit's behavior.
  • Several participants suggest that the circuit resembles a non-inverting amplifier, with specific voltage values influencing the calculations for resistor values.
  • One participant questions the calculation of current through resistors Rb and R1, seeking proof for the assumption that 1 mA flows through them.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of understanding the power supply connections to the op-amp and clarifies the direction of current flow.
  • There are multiple references to using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and voltage divider principles to analyze the circuit.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the role of Vs and how it relates to the op-amp's output voltage.
  • Participants share solutions and corrections, with some expressing uncertainty about their approaches and seeking further clarification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact type of op-amp configuration or the calculations involved. Various competing views and interpretations of the circuit's behavior remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of current flow, the role of the power supply, and the application of KVL in the context of the circuit. Some assumptions about component behavior and relationships are not fully clarified.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8373/circuit950.jpg

At first I thought a comparator, then I noticed a line connecting the Vout and the lines that connect to V- and V+, so it can't be a comparator, can it? I don't see any other option...

As far as the question, I need to find out the unknown resistors, but I'll start working on it once I figure that basic fact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As a start, you can either ignore Rx or the circuit is in saturated mode ... this is a consideration since the output current is defined to be 3 mA. The rest is just the usual KVL equations of an active op amp circuit (input voltages equal etc.).
 
Femme_physics said:

Homework Statement



http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/8373/circuit950.jpg

At first I thought a comparator, then I noticed a line connecting the Vout and the lines that connect to V- and V+, so it can't be a comparator, can it? I don't see any other option...

As far as the question, I need to find out the unknown resistors, but I'll start working on it once I figure that basic fact.

Looks like an amplifier with feedback, although the feedback mechanism is made a bit trickier due to the presence of Rx. What effect do you suppose the zener diode is going to have?

Rb and R1 form a voltage divider. What voltage are they dividing? What's the op-amp going to try to do with that voltage?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd say it looks a bit like an inverting amplifier, but it's not quite it.
KVL and KCL should tell what it does.
 
I hadn't noticed the output voltage is given. Since R1 is given, all components are defined implicitly.

You can solve this problem without writing any KVL equations. Hints: what must Ra be to satisfy Iz_min? What must Rb be to give a 12V output? And finally, what must Rx be to give 3 mA of current flowing into the op amp?
 
There are a few opamps with open collector outputs. This could be one of them.
 
I would say it is a non-inverting amplifier with voltage of 5V on the + input and voltage gain of R1/(R1+Rb).
Vout =+12V so Rb can be calculated... and so on
 
technician said:
I would say it is a non-inverting amplifier with voltage of 5V on the + input and voltage gain of R1/(R1+Rb).
Vout =+12V so Rb can be calculated... and so on

Nope on your gain expression ... but you're warm ...
 
gain of (R1+Rb)/R1 = 12/5 = 2.4
 
  • #10
Well, this is the solution my classmate offered

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/5638/classmate.jpg

I agree on Ra. It's just KVL.

But on Rb-- I'm confused as far as how to use a voltage divider.

I CAN indeed apply KVL

Since I know that the 3 mA split at this point marked in red:

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/5854/markedl.jpg

I know that there's only 1 mA going through Rb and R1, and I know they have a 12V potential difference to the ground. So,

Sum of all V = 0 ; 12 - 1ma x Rb -1ma x R1 = 0

I get that Rb 2000 ohms. Makes sense?


As far as Rx -- well, I don't really understand something fundamental about the circuit. Is Vs some type of another Vout? Or does it just define the limits of the Op-Amp like we see in those Vcc+ Vcc- sort of thing? I really don't know how to approach Vs. How can 25 Volt comes out of an op-amp who only produces a Vout of 12v?!? And how does any of that helps me with Rx?


Sorry-- A lot of questions, I know. Just a confusing circuit!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
+Vs is the power supply (you've previously seen it as +Vcc) to power the OP-AMP. There is no -Vcc here, the negative power supply here is ground (you've previously seen OP-AMP's negative supply as -Vcc, but not with this arrangement here).
 
  • #12
I know that there's only 1 mA going through Rb and R1
Proof please! :-p
 
  • #13
Femme_physics said:
Well, this is the solution my classmate offered
Are you referring to the words he's written to the right of the resistor string? :frown:
 
  • #14
+Vs is the power supply (you've previously seen it as +Vcc) to power the OP-AMP. There is no -Vcc here, the negative power supply here is ground (you've previously seen OP-AMP's negative supply as -Vcc, but not with this arrangement here).

Shouldn't the power supply ENTER the op-amp as opposed to EXIT from it?
Proof please!

Well, sum of all I entering that crossection I marked in red

3 -2 -I1 = 0
I1 = 1 mA

There you go...

Are you referring to the words he's written to the right of the resistor string?

LOL I didn't c that..sorry..ignore that part.
 
  • #15
Femme_physics said:
Shouldn't the power supply ENTER the op-amp as opposed to EXIT from it?

It does.
The arrow indicates that the wire goes to a power supply.
It does not indicate the direction of the current.
The actual current flows away from the 25V power supply.



Well, sum of all I entering that crossection I marked in red

3 -2 -I1 = 0
I1 = 1 mA

There you go...

What happened to the current coming from the 25V power supply that is coming in through Rx?


LOL I didn't c that..sorry..ignore that part.

How can we now that it's out there! ;)
 
  • #16
It does.
The arrow indicates that the wire goes to a power supply.
It does not indicate the direction of the current.
The actual current flows away from the 25V power supply.

OOOOOhhhhhhhhh! AHHHHHHA!

OH! OH!

Now I get it :)
What happened to the current coming from the 25V power supply that is coming in through Rx?

It's kinda late now but i'll sit with it tomorrow trying t finalize my results based on this new evidence!

How can we now that it's out there! ;)

Well, it just says "Or take it"

Or being my name. Telling me that I should take this exercise and try to solve it. He just put the "e" in front of the "k" by accident :)
 
  • #17
OOOOOhhhhhhhhh! AHHHHHHA!
Or take it!

Yes, I think I understand now what he meant. ;)
 
  • #18
Femme_physics said:
Well, sum of all I entering that crossection I marked in red

3 -2 -I1 = 0
I1 = 1 mA

There you go.../
I believe you realize this is so not right that you need to make a fresh start.

Hint: you know V+ so determine V_.
 
  • #19
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #20
Femme_physics said:
Taking your criticisms into consideration, here is my new idea...

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/5191/eevso.jpg

Looks good...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
Looks good...
Ah..the legendary Klaas enthusiasm persists I see... :biggrin:
Thanks.

NascentOxygen said:
I believe you realize this is so not right that you need to make a fresh start.

Hint: you know V+ so determine V_.
How?

If I use the Voltage Divider, it gets nullfied. Should I just use KVL to try and find it? Seems like a longer route, but I guess I can... unless I'm not seeing something?

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/2059/bolshenemagoo.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #22
Alternating between 2 threads is probably half the trouble, you are not giving yourself a chance to get to grips with either circuit. Let's stay with this one until you get a few fundamental misconceptions sorted out.

The op-amp inputs draw no current (so we say), so the op-amps can be ignored when it comes to affecting any circuit you connect to their inputs. You have a resistor divider here. The op-amp (-) input has no effect on the divider currents or voltages, so you can forget about it and just concentrate on the resistors.

EDITED: corrected

So V_ is set by the 12v and the resistor ratios.

What is V+ set to?
 
Last edited:
  • #23
V+ is ground.

How did you figure V- is necessarily 12V? Which formula or principle did you use?
 
  • #24
By V+ I mean the voltage on the op-amp's non-inverting input, often denoted V(+).

V_ is what you worked out here. https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3792342&postcount=21

Except you wrongly equated it to 0. It's value is a fraction of the op-amp's output, and the specifications of the problem tell you the op-amp output voltage is +12v.
 
  • #25
By V+ I mean the voltage on the op-amp's non-inverting input, often denoted V(+).

V_ is what you worked out here. https://www.physicsforums.com/showpos...2&postcount=21

Now I understand. There's still voltage at V-, but no current. I keep forgetting that,that's the op-amp properties.
Except you wrongly equated it to 0. It's value is a fraction of the op-amp's output, and the specifications of the problem tell you the op-amp output voltage is +12v.

Yes, Vout is 12
V- = a fraction of the output
V+ = 5 V (Due to the zener diode)
So V- = 7 V Wait, are you telling me that for any op-amp no matter what Vout = (V-) + (V+) ?

Anyway, here's the new refined solution :)

http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/3241/rbcalculations.jpg

I hope!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
Femme_physics said:
Yes, Vout is 12
V- = a fraction of the output
V+ = 5 V (Due to the zener diode)
So V- = 7 V
Correct for V+. But you are forgetting the important thing about op-amps (on which I expounded at length in your other thread) that V_ = V+ when operating as an amplifier. So V_ is not 7v.

Wait, are you telling me that for any op-amp no matter what Vout = (V-) + (V+) ?
In light of what I've just written, perish the thought!

You are not using your time to best advantage, Femme_physics. You have gone on and done further work, futilely, without waiting until you have had the answers here confirmed. So now you have to recalculate.

And don't forget that you already have worked out the value for the resistor feeding the Zener. I think it is Ra. So you are slowly getting there. :wink:

But as you will note, we haven't mentioned Rx yet.
Cja3i.gif
 
Last edited:
  • #27
Actually I did use some time to my advantage, and I thought I got Rx, but when I tried calculating it turns out I got the same equation despite the fact I picked two different loops...my equations cancel out Rx therefor!

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/396/17609068.jpg
Correct for V+. But you are forgetting the important thing about op-amps (on which I expounded at length in your other thread) that V_ = V+ when operating as an amplifier. So V_ is not 7v.

Oh right, as long as they're not used as comparators! I remember that explanation!

So V- = 5 V! Great. I can redo the calculation setting 5 instead of 7, but am still stuck with Rx...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #28
There are a number of theories accounting for the inclusion of Rx in this circuit. Fortunately, we don't need to understand any of them in order to determine what value the designer must have chosen for Rx. :smile: We can come back and consider the finer points of his design philosophy later.

You have noted there is a potential difference across Rx of 13v. Good.

The current that flows from the 25v supply through Rx must get to ground somehow, otherwise no current would flow. 3mA of it goes into the output of the op-amp. I can see that you account for about another 2mA thorough the zener, to keep the zener's voltage firmly at 5v. Any other routes for Rx's current to get to ground that you can see?

Once you have accounted for all the current through Rx you can use Ohm's Law to determine what value Rx must be.

Good luck! :wink:
 
  • #30
Femme_physics said:
What do you think?

Flowers...
Or...
More flowers...
:!)
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K