What type of op-amp is being used in this circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Op-amp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around identifying the type of op-amp used in a given circuit, with participants initially considering it a comparator before concluding it functions as a non-inverting amplifier with feedback. The circuit analysis involves calculating unknown resistors, with specific attention to the roles of resistors Rb and Rx, and the influence of a zener diode on the voltage levels. Participants utilize Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to derive relationships between voltages and currents in the circuit, ultimately determining the values needed for the resistors to achieve the desired output. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing op-amp circuits, particularly regarding current flow and feedback mechanisms. Understanding the op-amp's properties is crucial for solving the circuit effectively.
  • #51
M Quack said:
my point about feeding Ra from +25V. You have less control over the current through the Zener, though if there are variations on the +25V line.
A technique sometimes used in power supplies is to feed the zener from the regulated line so that the current into the zener is exceptionally stable. I don't know whether that thinking was behind the reason for doing it here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Femme_physics said:
You mean that Vout = 12V?

True, we can't really tell. Can we? It's rather confusing. BUT according to the fact the current goes into the op-amp, that's our key in telling it's an inverter, right?

The circuit is definitely a non-inverting amplifier, gain = +2.4V/V. If you were to change the input from +5V to say + 5.5V you would get 2.4*5.5 = +2.64V output.

If the output goes up when the input goes up, that's a non-inverting configuration. It has nothing to do with the direction of current at the input or output.
 
  • #53
Femme_physics, I notice in your calculation of V(-) you used an erroneous formula for the resistive divider involving Rb:

9N9AJ.jpg



So Rb and Rx will need to be recomputed. Circuit parameters do evaluate to nice round figures now. https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon6.gif

http://img804.imageshack.us/img804/1388/writer.gif "... so I think you should return the flowers..."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #54
NascentOxygen said:
Femme_physics, I notice in your calculation of V(-) you used an erroneous formula for the resistive divider involving Rb:
Actually, your formula is perfectly correct! I was relying on memory and in my mind had Rb and R1 swapped around. :(
 
  • #55
rude man said:
The circuit is definitely a non-inverting amplifier, gain = +2.4V/V. If you were to change the input from +5V to say + 5.5V you would get 2.4*5.5 = +2.64V output.
True, but that's only half the story...

The circuit is also definitely an inverting amplifier, gain = -1.4 v/v. Using the lower end of R1 for input, if you change the input voltage from 0v (ground) to -0.5v, the output rises from +12v to +12.7v. Viewed this way, the zener functions to bias the op-amp so as to allow operation from a single polarity power supply.
 
  • #56
Q-Fever...OK, this is an attempt to see if the working point at V+=V-=Vout=0V is stable.

Note that my knowledge about electronics is very limited and that this may be a completely wrong way of looking at the problem.

Let's assume the following:

The op-amp as a huge open-loop gain G such that Vout=G(V+ - V-) + Vs/2. G will be something like 10^4 or 10^6. Vs/2 is the midpoint between the supply and ground.

Looking at the characterstic curve of the Zener diode: Around 0V, the Zener diode behaves like a resistor with a fairly large impedance Rz. I guess Rz>RI/4 (you will see later why). Let's say Rz=6.5 kΩ just to have a number.

Now assume V+=ε, a small voltage and V-=0 (it works the same way with V=-ε or V+=ε1 and V-=ε2).

You then get Vout = G ε + Vs/2, which leads to

V-=RI/(Rb+RI)*(Gε+Vs/2)=0.42 (Gε+Vs/2)
V+=Rz/(Ra+Rz)*(Gε+Vs/2)=0.65(Gε+Vs/2)

V+ - V- = (0.65-0.42)(Gε +Vs/2) which is larger than the starting point (which was ε), so the situation is unstable and Vout will drift up until the Zener no longer behaves as a
resistor. For a very small value of ε the constant offset Vs/2 on the output voltage dominates. It does not even matter if ε is positive or negative

For this to be the case RI cannot be too large, RI < Rb/Ra Rz.

For those who wonder if the assumption Vout=G(V+ - V-) + Vs/2 is compatible with the "normal" operation of the circuit:

Assume V+=5V and V-=5v-ε, Vout=12V and G=10000.
Then you get G(5V - (5V-ε))+Vs/2 = Gε + 12.5V = 12V, i.e. ε=-0.5V/G=-50μV which can be neglected.

At the operating point with Vz=5V, the Zener diode has a very steep characteristic curve, i.e. a very small impedance. If Vout changes, the change in V+ will be much smaller than that in V-, so that the negative feedback dominates and Vout is stabilized.

So, NascentOxygen, am I thinking along the right lines here? (I've just made it up, don't be too polite if it's all BS).
 
  • #57
M Quack said:
The op-amp as a huge open-loop gain G such that Vout=G(V+ - V-) + Vs/2.
I guess that's right. Op-amps usually are powered by double supplies, so your Vs/2 term is unusual, but I can't see it could be anything else.
looking at the characterstic curve of the Zener diode: Around 0V, the Zener diode behaves like a resistor with a fairly large impedance Rz. I guess Rz>RI/4 (you will see later why).
That's right.

situation is unstable and Vout will drift up until the Zener no longer behaves as a
resistor.
So there is no stable state with Vout=0. In practice, you usually won't get the op-amp delivering an output equal to either supply rail, in any case, so you wouldn't be able to obtain Vout=0.

You analysis is spot on. Below the zener breakdown, the amplifier has more positive feedback than negative. This could send Vout towards 0 but nothing happens that would keep it there, and any noise that sends Vout towards +Vs will succeed, owing to a nett positive feedback.

Well done!
 
  • #58
Thanks for checking.
 
Back
Top