The velocity of light in the medium

ENDLESSYOU
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
We know that light travels at the same speed in vacuum regardless of the observer.And light also travels at a speed of c/n in the medium.My question is since c/n is the limit speed in medium,then do we have the similar Lorentz transformation in the medium which just replace c with c/n?
For example, suppose space is filled with medium.And the observer is in S-frame in the medium. A light is traveling in S'-frame which is also in the medium and is moving at the speed of u respect to S.Then what's the speed of light that the observer measures in S? c/n?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ENDLESSYOU said:
We know that light travels at the same speed in vacuum regardless of the observer.And light also travels at a speed of c/n in the medium.
c/n is the phase velocity of the light in the medium.
My question is since c/n is the limit speed in medium,then do we have the similar Lorentz transformation in the medium which just replace c with c/n?
c/n is not the limit speed, c is. (Check out: Cherenkov radiation) The Lorentz transformations remain as usual.
For example, suppose space is filled with medium.And the observer is in S-frame in the medium. A light is traveling in S'-frame which is also in the medium and is moving at the speed of u respect to S.Then what's the speed of light that the observer measures in S? c/n?
No. The speed measured by the observer will be the relativistic sum of those velocities (using the relativistic addition of velocity).
 
ENDLESSYOU said:
For example, suppose space is filled with medium.And the observer is in S-frame in the medium. A light is traveling in S'-frame which is also in the medium and is moving at the speed of u respect to S.Then what's the speed of light that the observer measures in S? c/n?

Doc Al said:
No. The speed measured by the observer will be the relativistic sum of those velocities (using the relativistic addition of velocity).

In fact, this was first observed by Fizeau in the 1850s. Of course, he didn't recognize it as relativistic velocity addition, but Einstein did, more than fifty years later!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizeau–Foucault_apparatus#Speed_of_light_in_moving_media
 
jtbell said:
Of course, he didn't recognize it as relativistic velocity addition, but Einstein did, more than fifty years later!

Nevertheless Fizeau's experiment was a major step toward to relativity because the experiments of Michelson and Morley can not be interpreted correctly without falsification of a complete aether drag.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top