Planck's Constant, what does it mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter miniradman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Mean
miniradman
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
G'day.

I've been doing some research on the internet about Max Planck and his Achievements. One of them being Planck's constant (6.64 x 10-34)... but there is nowhere on the internet that actually tells me what that numbe actually represents? Sure, there are a whole heap of formula which are associated with "h" but when I find the gradient of frequency vs Kmax what exactly am I looking at?

Thanks

*also, could I ask whoever is explaining this to keep the complex terminology to a minimum. I've just started learning about Quantum Physics and I'm not familiar with all the lingo just yet ;)*

Cheers :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's important to include the units: h = 6.63e-34 kg m^2 /s

You can think of the units as being units of position (meters) times momentum (kilogram-meters per second). The value of h might be most easily understood based on its fundamental role in the uncertainty principle. Loosely stated, the uncertainty principle says that if we measure a particle's position to some accuracy A (measured in meters) and simultaneously its momentum to some accuracy B (measured in kilogram-meters per second), then we must have A*B > h. Thus, given A or B there is a minimum value of the other. If I measure the position of a particle to within 1 millimeter, there is a minimum uncertainty in its momentum of h/(1 millimeter) or about 6.6e-31 kg*m/s. This is of course a tiny uncertainty, because h is such a tiny number, at least when expressed in familiar units like kg, m, and s.

If we don't care about knowing any momenta to this precision (e.g. in analyzing the flight of a baseball) we can use classical mechanics and forget quantum effects entirely. But once we start looking at very small scales and investigating things like the position and momenta typical of electrons in atoms, the uncertainty principle starts placing important bounds, and thus quantum effects become important. So the value of h tells you when quantum mechanics is important, or when it isn't and you can use classical mechanics.

Planck's constant, often denoted as "h" and symbolized as ℎ, is a fundamental constant in physics. It is named after the German physicist Max Planck, who introduced it in 1900 as part of his work on the quantum theory of radiation. Planck's constant plays a pivotal role in the field of quantum mechanics and is fundamental to our understanding of the behavior of subatomic particles and the quantization of energy.

Here's what Planck's constant represents and why it's significant:

  1. Quantization of Energy: Planck's constant is intimately related to the idea that energy is quantized, meaning it exists in discrete, indivisible units or "quanta." This was a groundbreaking departure from classical physics, where energy was considered continuous.
  2. Relationship to Frequency: Planck's constant is related to the energy of a photon (a particle of light) and its frequency (ν) through the equation E = hν. This equation states that energy is directly proportional to the frequency of a photon, and the constant of proportionality is Planck's constant.
  3. Explanation of Blackbody Radiation: Planck's constant was first introduced by Max Planck to explain the spectral distribution of blackbody radiation. His theory showed that by assuming energy levels were quantized in integer multiples of hν, he could accurately describe the observed behavior of such radiation.
  4. Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle: Planck's constant is one of the key components in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics. This principle states that there is a fundamental limit to how precisely certain pairs of properties (like position and momentum) of a particle can be simultaneously known. The uncertainty principle relies on the concept of quantized energy levels.
  5. Units: Planck's constant has units of energy multiplied by time, which can be expressed as joule-seconds (J·s) in the International System of Units (SI). In quantum mechanics, it's often more convenient to work with the reduced Planck's constant (ħ), which is h divided by 2π. The reduced Planck's constant appears frequently in equations involving angular momentum and wavefunctions.
  6. Value: The value of Planck's constant in SI units is approximately 6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s. This value is extremely small, underscoring the tiny size of individual quantum energy levels.
Planck's constant is one of the most important constants in physics because it bridges the gap between classical physics, which describes the macroscopic world, and quantum mechanics, which describes the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic scale. It fundamentally altered our understanding of nature and has had far-reaching implications in fields such as quantum physics, atomic physics, and materials science.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So Planck's constant is the Uncertainty?
...
...
...
I still don't understand, sorry :rolleyes:
 
The_Duck said:
The value of h might be most easily understood based on its fundamental role in the uncertainty principle.
I thought I would post a couple simple images of a Graphical interpretation of uncertainty principle involving Planck's Constant and how it shows up when determining the energy for Particle Confinement:

unc2.gif


unc4.gif


From http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html
 
Planck's constant is not an uncertainty itself. But if, for example, you measure position to some fixed accuracy, the size of Planck's constant determines the minimum uncertainty in momentum.
 
Oh dear... I think my brain just imploded

I undertstand how the energy of confinement related to plank's constant. But I don't see the connection with Blackbody Radiation and The Photoelectric Effect.:frown:
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top