Scientists See Solution to Critical Barrier to Fusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Fusion
AI Thread Summary
Scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory have identified bubble-like islands in plasmas that collect impurities, cooling the plasma and contributing to the "density limit" issue in fusion reactors. Their research, published in Physical Review Letters, suggests that these islands hinder optimal fusion efficiency. Researchers Gates and Delgado-Aparicio plan to test their theory on the Alcator C-Mod and DIII-D tokamaks, exploring whether injecting power into these islands can increase plasma density. The discussion touches on the distinction between engineering and physics, with some participants arguing that the science of fusion is largely established, leaving engineering challenges to resolve. Overall, the focus is on advancing fusion technology through experimental refinements.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,179
Reaction score
7,656
Interesting. According to the following link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120423143128.htm
An in-depth analysis by scientists from the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) zeroed in on tiny, bubble-like islands that appear in the hot, charged gases -- or plasmas -- during experiments. These minute islands collect impurities that cool the plasma. And it is these islands, the scientists report in the April 20 issue of Physical Review Letters, that are at the root of a long-standing problem known as the "density limit" that can prevent fusion reactors from operating at maximum efficiency.

Gates and Delgado-Aparicio now hope to test their theory with experiments on a tokamak called Alcator C-Mod at MIT, and on the DIII-D tokamak at General Atomics in San Diego. Among other things, they intend to see if injecting power directly into the islands will lead to higher density. If so, that could help future tokamaks reach the extreme density and 100-million-degree temperatures that fusion requires.

What do you all make of this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
zapperzero said:
Angels dancing on pinheads. As I see it, the science needed for fusion has been done a long time ago. It's all engineering from here on out.

I guess it depends on where you draw the line between engineering and physics.
 
Drakkith said:
I guess it depends on where you draw the line between engineering and physics.

Eh. I was being facetious, but only somewhat. Searching a space of possible solutions in for an optimum is what I tend to think of as engineering. Of course, if along the way one stumbles across new phenomena, that is science again, but only of a minor sort, usually :).

This thing you posted about is pure engineering - these relatively cold islands had been known to exist for quite a while. These guys are proposing to heat them up with microwaves, which in turn is a refinement of existing technique.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top