Can Time Exist Before the Big Bang?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackskynet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of time in relation to the Big Bang, questioning whether time can exist before it. It suggests that if the Big Bang marks T=0, then time could theoretically extend into negative values, indicating a pre-Big Bang state. However, the Big Bang is described as a process of expansion rather than a definitive starting event, complicating the notion of time before it. While mathematical models allow for negative time, the physical implications of such values remain uncertain, leading many cosmologists to assert that time before the Big Bang is a meaningless concept. Ultimately, the relationship between time and the Big Bang continues to be a complex and unresolved topic in cosmology.
blackskynet
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If we calculate Birth of Time then T= 0 or T ≠ 0.
If Big Bang cause time then should we consider Big Bang time T = 0.
But in real life we do have numbers beyond 0. Example : -1 , -2, -3 ...-1000 & so on.
We represent space-time with numbers which are infinite on both side before 0 & after 0...
so how space-time can be finite starting from Big Bang ?
Can we consider Space-time was traveling in high dimension before Big Bang.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If Big Bang cause time then should we consider Big Bang time T = 0.

The Big Bang was a process, not an "event". It describes the early expansion of the Universe, not its beginning.

We represent space-time with numbers which are infinite on both side before 0 & after 0...
so how space-time can be finite starting from Big Bang ?

The same way that I can have a finite collection of objects, even though the set of natural numbers is infinite. Mind you, the infinitude of space is not an entirely settled issue.

Can we consider Space-time was traveling in high dimension before Big Bang.

I have no idea what this means.
 
Time is a measure of change. In cosmology change is usually expressed in terms of a scale factor - a(t) - where t is the time elapsed after the big bang. It is a simple idea, the universe gets bigger as t increases, and smaller as t decreases. Can t be negative? We don't know. Mathematically, it is certainly possible, and it is widely believed the universe is mathematically consistent. It is, however, unclear if any actual physical meaning can be attached to values of t < 0, or even to t = 0. For that reason cosmologists say the big bang theory does not describe the universe at t = 0 and often say the very concept of time before the big bang is meaningless.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top