How do you calculate the integral dz/(z^2+h^2)^(2/3)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NadAngel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
AI Thread Summary
The integral ∫dz/(z^2+h^2)^(3/2) is discussed as a problem related to electrostatics, with a proposed solution being z/(h^2*(z^2+h^2)^(1/2). Initial attempts at integration by substitution were unsuccessful, leading to doubts about the integrability using standard functions. It is suggested that the integral may require special functions like the Hypergeometric function or Incomplete Beta function for a closed form. A correct approach involves algebraic rearrangement and a trigonometric substitution, specifically using \frac{z}{h} = \tan \theta. The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying solutions through differentiation.
NadAngel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve a problem I saw in a book about electrostatics. In the book the solution to the integral ∫dz/(z^2+h^2)^(3/2) is z/(h^2*(z^2+h^2)^(1/2) but I can't solve the integral by myself. I have tried integration by substitution but I can't seem to solve it.

u=z^2+h^2
du=2zdz
dz=du/2z

This does not yield a correct result.

PS: h is a constant, so you only need to integrate it by dz.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey NadAngel and welcome to the forums.

That answer is not correct and you can differentiate the answer to see if it equals the expression inside the integral from the fundamental theorem of calculus. I would try this and do this first.

For the substitution though wikipedia has a good list of integral tables:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_integrals_of_rational_functions
 
Hi !
I doubt that you could integrate it with this method.
I think that this integral cannot be expressed as a combination of a finite number of usual fuctions. The closed form will probably requires an Hypergeometric function, or more simply, an Incomplete Beta function.
 
Thank you for the replies. It seems I have made a typo in the post and the correct integral of interest is:
∫dz/(z^2+h^2)^(3/2)

The solution in the book is the same: z/(h^2*(z^2+h^2)^(1/2)

Can this be soved?
 
NadAngel said:
Thank you for the replies. It seems I have made a typo in the post and the correct integral of interest is:
∫dz/(z^2+h^2)^(3/2)

The solution in the book is the same: z/(h^2*(z^2+h^2)^(1/2)

Can this be soved?

Yes, quite simply too.

First rearrange algebraically to get:

\frac{1}{h^3}\int {[1 + {(\frac{z}{h})}^2]}^{-\frac{3}{2}} dz

Then make the substitution \frac{z}{h} = \tan \theta.

Can you take it from there? Remember your trig identities.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top