Mathematica Composition of Vector Functions in Mathematica

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on defining vector functions A and B in Mathematica for composing transformations. A is defined as a matrix multiplication of a 2D vector, while B includes a translation vector, complicating direct composition. Users suggest simplifying the matrix and vector definitions to facilitate easier composition using dot products. The correct syntax involves using lists for matrices and vectors, allowing for straightforward evaluation of compositions like A ∘ B ∘ A. The proposed solution seems promising for achieving the desired functionality.
Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
I want to define something like:
A\left(\begin{matrix} x \\ y\end{matrix}\right) = \left(\begin{matrix} 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{matrix}\right)\left(\begin{matrix} x \\ y\end{matrix}\right)
B\left(\begin{matrix} x \\ y\end{matrix}\right) = \left(\begin{matrix} 0 & 1 \\ 2 & -1 \end{matrix}\right)\left(\begin{matrix} x \\ y\end{matrix}\right)+\left(\begin{matrix} 1 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)
And then I want to be able to evaluate compositions such as A \circ B \circ A\left(\begin{matrix} x \\ y\end{matrix}\right) quickly and easily.

Currently I'm using this syntax:
A[x_,y_] = {{1,-1},{-1,1}}.{{x},{y}}

However, when I define such a function, the output is a column vector, not a list, and I can't input a column vector into the next function. How do I do ths?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand your syntax correctly, you have too many brackets in the column vector definition. A column vector should be just a simple list, and a matrix should be a nested list. Instead of:
A[x_,y_] = {{1,-1},{-1,1}}.{{x},{y}}

Just define:

A = {{1,-1},{-1,1}}
B = {{0,1},{2,-1}}
X = {x,y}

Then you can simply compose them with the dot product, such as:

(A.(B.A)).X
 
I can't do that, because B has a translation vector
 
Is this what you are looking for?

In[1]:= A[{x_,y_}]:={{1,-1},{-1,1}}.{x,y};
B[{x_,y_}]:={{0,1},{2,-1}}.{x,y}+{1,1};
Composition[A,B,A][{x,y}]

Out[3]= {-2 x-2 (x-y)+2 y,2 x+2 (x-y)-2 y}
 
I'll have to try it out when i get back tonight, but that looks very promising, thanks :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top